Glad to hear it does not stack and that there is no creep. Take up is often present in DA/SA guns. Just the way it is.
I am going to be picking mine up later today and will post some pics and a target if I can get out to the range.
I did find out some info or some rational speculation on these pistols. This is from the Beretta Forum. All the bolded parts what was posted on the Beretta forum.
It appears to me that these 92S examples are different from the standard 92S version produced in the 1980's. Maybe a special run made only for the Italian military/police? I'll speculate that's the case. It's interesting that they would stick with such an older model, not to mention that they actually blued them instead of applying the Bruniton. It would be nice to know if they actually produced these in 2004. Or were they produced in the 1980's, stockpiled and then proofed 20 years later. That seems hard to believe.
- Much later date code BU = 2004
- Extra markings "PM" on slide and barrel,
- Some other type of serial number on the barrel?
- Possesses the larger hammer pin and corresponding slot in the slide that was introduced with the 92FS -JoseyWales2
From what I have read and been told by people who have picked up their guns is that there is some variance in what people got. I have seen date codes from 1998 - 2004 all of which is well past the date that the 92S was in regular production. There is a member of the Beretta forum who has one which does not have the larger hammer pin and slot in the slide that is present in the 92FS. A date code was not provided for that particular gun but it was bought at Bud's and showed wear and was not one of the excellent/NIB guns found at Dans or SOG.
This is was also posted over there:
I've been in touch with Vins_cb on this topic, and he provided a couple of pieces of information that I either forgot or never knew. Those are that firearms produced in Italy for the Italian armed forces (including police) do not have to be proofed, and that it was a common practice in Italy to send your 98F to Beretta in Gardone and have it converted to FS by swapping the hammer pin and milling the slide.
His thinking is that the pistols were manufactured in the early 1980s and sold to police/military, who issued some and stockpiled the rest. The FS hammer pins and milled slides may have been done when all the 98F owners were having theirs done, or when the pistols were traded back to Beretta for newer models. In either case, Beretta wanted to sell these trade-ins on the civilian market and had to get them proofed to do so, which they did in 2004.
That explanation fits neatly with what we can observe.
He didn't have an explanation for the alphanumeric string on the barrel or the MP on the barrel and slide. -holepuncher
I found all of this very interesting.