Pentagon Confirms Move to 6.8mm

[rickyrick]

Yeah,

If the Army only had access to engineers, scientist, experienced soldiers, and all the resources Bubba has at his disposal the they could have found a 5.56mn Wonder Bullet solving all their problems!!

Nobody can beat Bubba...

But yet it’s civilian companies designing the stuff. Why do you assume that there’s no engineers, veterans or possibly even a scientist or two here? Or that no one here is educated enough?

It’s a really simple fact, up until now, there wasn’t any gun that could do what the proposed weapon is required to do. Now they have a couple of prototypes for testing. The Army may or may not select one of these samples.

And yes, bubba’s bullets, no matter the caliber are always way better than government bullets.

 

[44 AMP]

There are lots of things that look good on paper (or PowerPoint) but don't go over as well when turned into real world working models.

What ever happened to that 5.56mm upper with the 20mm programable grenade launcher lower?? It was some time back, the last I heard was they had gotten the prototypes down to 18lbs (still a few pounds above target weight) and the govt was not thrilled about the cost of the grenade rounds, which was reported to be several thousand dollars, each...though that was expected to come down with volume production...

As far as I can tell, that idea went away...

The days of the military actually doing design work for most things are long past. Which actually fits with the base concept of capitalism, and a free market, as well as cost competition being a benefit to the public.

It doesn't always get done that way, but the concept is sound. The army doesn't need to spend resources designing a better mousetrap anymore, they just turn to the private sector and say, "we'll buy a better mousetrap, if it will do A, B, and C. What have you got??"

Somebody(s) will come up with something, if there's a chance of making a buck. Always interesting to see if what gets submitted turns out to be something actually better, or just different...

 

[davidsog]

Always interesting to see if what gets submitted turns out to be something actually better, or just different...

Yep. The ammunition is already selected and ready to be produced. They are just looking for a weapon to shoot it and they will find one.

 

[JohnKSa]

Some cleanup work has been done.

This isn't going to turn into a discussion of why veterans are or aren't, or think they are or aren't, or why others think they are or aren't, superior to citizens.

 

[davidsog]

As far as I can tell, that idea went away...

It was a technology litmus with no intention of production which is a little different.

Had the condition existed:

“everyone from Russia and China, to Hezbollah” and the Islamic State is employing advanced armor that “risks making the 5.56 round essentially obsolete.”

You would have seen a production contract for a replacement ASAP.

Kind of like how the USAAC Replaced the P-26 five years later with the P-40...

Obsolescence is a huge motivator.

 

[2damnold4this]

The ammunition is already selected and ready to be produced.

My impression was that the ammunition had yet to be selected. Can you tell us more about the ammunition that was selected? I'd be interested to know more about it.

 

[davidsog]

My impression was that the ammunition had yet to be selected. Can you tell us more about the ammunition that was selected? I'd be interested to know more about it.
2damnold4this is online now

156. Question: Is the USG interested in vendor-supplied Surrogate and/or GP projectile production efforts to supply PON participants?

Response: No, the Government is planning to provide the surrogate and GP projectiles to the PON participants.

161. Question: In Attachment 3, is USG interested in other 6.8mm projectile technology that becomes available during the estimated 27 month PON effort?

Response: No, the Government intends to provide the 6.8mm projectile.

file:///C:/Users/19109/Downloads/NGSW_Industry_Questions_&_Comments_152_-_281_Part_2.pdf

The Government already has the ammunition it wants.....

 

[2damnold4this]

Projectiles aren't complete rounds of ammunition. Has the Army selected a projectile or has it selected a round of ammunition?

 

[rickyrick]

The Army left it up to vendors to design the type of 6.8mm cartridge they wanted to use in their prototypes, Hodne said, adding that some gun makers went with "traditional bottleneck" brass cartridges while others used newer, case-telescoped cartridges.

https://www.military.com/daily-news...s-timeline-fielding-new-infantry-weapons.html

The service's goal is to select a final design for both weapons from a single provider in the first quarter of 2022 and begin replacing M4s and M249s in an infantry brigade combat team (IBCT) in the first quarter of 2023, said Hodne, director of the Army's Soldier Lethality Cross Functional Team.

Still seems to me that the final cartridges and weapons don’t exist yet.

 

[davidsog]

Still seems to me that the final cartridges and weapons don’t exist yet.

That is kind of a dumb and obvious statement. It is PON...That means PROJECT OPPORTUNITY NOTICE. No the final cartriages are not available but they are shooting real cartriadges on ranges and the 27 month timeline is counting down.

It is calling for 27 months of initial prototyping and then iterative prototyping for at least 8 years. What that means is the Army will begin fielding the design they accept in 27 months. The design team and manufacturer is on the hook for any design changes that are required for at least the next 8 years. Data will be collected in the units to assist in that.

It is kind of like how we got from the M16 to the M4 carbine......

5. Question: Why reference either [(flying supersonic and managing recoil)] in relation to the baseline 5.56mm at that much extra power?

Response: The “Ammunition” includes an assembled cartridge case with propellant, primer, and a Government provided 6.8 millimeter projectiles. Reference DRAFT NGSW PON, Attachment 3 – Ammunition Data for more information on the ammunition. For the Government’s desired capabilities, reference DRAFT NGSW PON Attachment 13 – Capability
Matrix.

Attachment 3 is not available to the public. The government knows exactly what it wants and has supplied projectiles.

It is not going to stifle engineering creativity or ingenuity as long as the ammunition meets the already achieved performance for lethality.

I do not think it is very hard to understand nor is it some intellectual exercise.

Facts are 5.56mm is obsolete on today's battlefield. You can cry me a river over it but it does not matter what you think on the subject.


The Army wants the 6.8mm round and at least the performance it already achieved.

It could care less if vendor engineers achieve that performance with ceaseless ammunition, telescoping, or plain ol' brass. The engineers that can come up with the most battlefield advantages and lowest cost in the timeline the Army has set will win. Whoever's prototype offers the most advantages will win the contract.

It is that simple. 5.56mm is obsolete and will be replaced. The projectiles the Army wants are being slung downrange at the performance the Army wants as we type in this thread.

http://soldiersystems.net/2019/01/3...-ppon-for-next-generation-squad-weapons-ngsw/

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportu...516619fb4b156540d7670296de6&tab=core&_cview=1

 

[rickyrick]

IIRC, 2021 is the deadline to be fielded.

from your own post
You’ve insisted over and over that this is a done deal... and it’s not.
Nothing is done until it happens.

All I’ve contended is that this deadline is too short, that it may not even pass muster or get approved.
Definitely not going to happen by 2021... with 2020 just a few short months away.

This is a pretty significant upgrade... not only from the 5.56, this aims to replace all that’s been tried. The energy they want isn’t possible from an M4 sized weapon, not without increasing weight and loosing ammunition capacity

 

[stagpanther]

I don't know--people have succeeded in making LR308 builds that came all the way down to 6 lbs--even under; then it becomes a game of recoil management and being tuff enough for sustained fire. Hard for me to imagine a high BC/SD .277 bullet that will conform to present day AR/M4 magazine specs and be able to go out long range as well; I'm guessing they end up somewhere between the AR and LR (rem 30 comes to mind).

 

[davidsog]

from your own post

That is NOT my date. That is the US Army timeline as they have put out to the vendors.

 

[rickyrick]

Ok, doesn’t seem as realistic now.

I honestly hope this goes through, but I have doubts. If anything, a lot will be learned even if a replacement isn’t selected by this program. I will follow this until the end.

 

[Bartholomew Roberts]

It’s horsehockey. Let’s just look at the published requirements. We need a 6.8mm EPR projectile that can penetrate any currently or near term fielded body armor at 600m. It also needs to still deliver accuracy after 10,000 rounds.

Those are two contradictory requirements. For this to happen the Army has to deliver technology no small arms manufacturer has ever showcased.

 

[davidsog]

Obsolescence is a powerful motivator.

 

[davidsog]

Those are two contradictory requirements.

No. Modern Barrel design can easily exceed a life of 10,000 rounds.

We need a 6.8mm EPR projectile that can penetrate any currently or near term fielded body armor at 600m.

That has already been done and why the Army supplies the projectiles.....

 

[Bartholomew Roberts]

It’s an underwear gnome project.

No. Modern Barrel design can easily exceed a life of 10,000 rounds.

Not in a 6.8 caliber round that can punch level 4 plates at 600m - and the actual requirement isn’t 10,000 rounds, it is something like (going from memory cause I’m not going to look it up for this stupid conversation) “less than 10% increase in dispersion after 10k rounds.”

 

[davidsog]

“Right now, the feedback looks like we are going to a 6.8 mm round,” Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley said recently.

The service has a list of its top six modernization priorities and “soldier lethality” is one of the items. The most high-profile program in that category is the squad automatic rifle. Army Secretary Mark Esper at the Association of the United States Army annual conference — while promising the service is speeding up the way it does acquisition — singled out the program as one that would see prototypes in the near future.

“The bottom line is that we are committed to a new rifle,” Milley told reporters.

He added: “We don’t want to speak too much about its technical capabilities because our adversaries watch these things very closely.”

https://www.nationaldefensemagazine...army-serious-about-fielding-6-8-caliber-round

 

[davidsog]

Not in a 6.8 caliber round that can punch level 4 plates at 600m - and the actual requirement isn’t 10,000 rounds, it is something like (going from memory cause I’m not going to look it up for this stupid conversation) “less than 10% increase in dispersion after 10k rounds.”

Why do you think that is impossible? We had conventional barrels that had 60,000 round plus and still going strong.

All of this exist's right now and at least six vendors are tweaking it to gain efficiencies.

https://twitter.com/nicholadrummond/status/1115556472031784960?lang=en