You may not be a snob, but I think your theory is really warped in the year 2011.
Colt is a mere shadow of the company that bankrolled the gun that a man designed for them on contract. They make a great 1911 now, but to argue that it's less a copy than one made by any other fine company is almost silly. If anything, Colt is copying Colt... or Browning. Nothing about Colt in the year 2011 is the same as the Colt that rolled out 1911 pistols in the first half of the 20th century. And all the other government issue 1911 pistols that came out of the other facilities... would they get kicked to the curb as copies also? Colt produced some really poor guns in the early 90s that wouldn't hang with 75% of the 1911 pistols being sold today by a dozen manufacturers.
Armalite is absolutely not the company that Eugene Stoner designed a rifle for anymore. It's a name that was purchased like Bob Serva purchased the Dan Wesson name (and breathed life in to it, then sold for what was likely a tremendous profit to CZ-USA) And Stoner has passed on.
And Glock? They didn't even pioneer the polymer pistol, they were just the first really successful operation to succeed in the market with it. Others followed and in the eyes of MANY, have improved in places where Glock has refused... or even grudgingly acknowledged with the some of the features of the Gen 4.
There's nothing at all wrong with having a game plan and sticking to it... but I think yours is a bit misguided and might really cheat you out of some
much better firearms than what you might consider the only "real" ones.
But having choices is great!