Dearhunter61
New member
Experienced shooter?
Perhaps someone could set the standard for what is considered an experienced shooter? I have been hunting for over 25 years but up until 8 months ago I was one of the guys on the range every October making sure his rifle was still sighted in before deer season. Even then the standard was 1.5 MOA with factory ammo. The reasons I did not shoot more was cost of ammo and the Texas heat. Since then I have started reloading and shooting a lot more. Although I have managed to find loads for each of my rifles, 223, 22-250, 270, 280, 7mm-08, 7mm Mag and 300 Mag which are sub MOA. Actually multiple loads for each that are sub MOA I do not consider myself to be an "experienced shooter". Actually it was not until I started reloading and going to the range more often that I realized just how little I know.
Before bad knees and back ended my golf playing which has lead me to get into reloading and shooting more I was a low single digit handicapper and I know that the difference between a low single digit and a scratch golfer is probably about the same as a good shooter who knows a little and a great shooter who knows a lot. It seems the more I learn about shooting the more I realize how much I do not know. So what is an "experienced shooter" and does that also equate to a great shooter?
One more thing...it was said that NEW rifles are built to shoot sub MOA out of the box today. Are you saying they shoot factory ammo this good? I must say at least with factory ammo I have not found this to be true. I have purchased two new rifles over the last 6 months, Ruger 280 and Remington 7mm-08, and although they both shoot good with the loads I have realoded for them, it took a while to find the loads, they did not shoot factory ammo at sub-MOA. In fact they actually shot factory ammo worse than my older rifles. I have two rifles that are 25 and 30 years old, Browning BBR 7mm Mag and Remington 700 BDL 300 Mag, and both of these rifles actually shoot better than my new ones. I bought the new ones because I did not want to deal with the recoil of the magnums but based on the performance of my 7 Mag it will be the one I use deer hunting again this year.
Perhaps someone could set the standard for what is considered an experienced shooter? I have been hunting for over 25 years but up until 8 months ago I was one of the guys on the range every October making sure his rifle was still sighted in before deer season. Even then the standard was 1.5 MOA with factory ammo. The reasons I did not shoot more was cost of ammo and the Texas heat. Since then I have started reloading and shooting a lot more. Although I have managed to find loads for each of my rifles, 223, 22-250, 270, 280, 7mm-08, 7mm Mag and 300 Mag which are sub MOA. Actually multiple loads for each that are sub MOA I do not consider myself to be an "experienced shooter". Actually it was not until I started reloading and going to the range more often that I realized just how little I know.
Before bad knees and back ended my golf playing which has lead me to get into reloading and shooting more I was a low single digit handicapper and I know that the difference between a low single digit and a scratch golfer is probably about the same as a good shooter who knows a little and a great shooter who knows a lot. It seems the more I learn about shooting the more I realize how much I do not know. So what is an "experienced shooter" and does that also equate to a great shooter?
One more thing...it was said that NEW rifles are built to shoot sub MOA out of the box today. Are you saying they shoot factory ammo this good? I must say at least with factory ammo I have not found this to be true. I have purchased two new rifles over the last 6 months, Ruger 280 and Remington 7mm-08, and although they both shoot good with the loads I have realoded for them, it took a while to find the loads, they did not shoot factory ammo at sub-MOA. In fact they actually shot factory ammo worse than my older rifles. I have two rifles that are 25 and 30 years old, Browning BBR 7mm Mag and Remington 700 BDL 300 Mag, and both of these rifles actually shoot better than my new ones. I bought the new ones because I did not want to deal with the recoil of the magnums but based on the performance of my 7 Mag it will be the one I use deer hunting again this year.