Aluminum and steel are dead guys, Polymers are the here & Now. ..and they're here to stay.
A company would be foolish to design a new pistol in metal.
Yes, I realize that. I accidentally wrote "barrel" when I meant "breechblock". I had referred to the barrel as being fixed, in the previous sentence.James K said:Not quite the case, Chris. The barrel is fixed and doesn't move at all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remington_Model_51Because of a lower bore axis, lighter slide, and locked breech, the Remington 53 boasted much less felt recoil than the M1911. This fact was attested to by noted firearms expert Julian Hatcher.[6] The Remington pistol was also more accurate, lighter, and had fewer moving parts than the 1911.
and I'm sure the fact that the M1911 was 45ACP and the M51 was 32 auto and 380 had nothing to do with the lighter felt recoil
the Remington 53 boasted much less felt recoil than the M1911
This design looks to be far superior to the 1911.
Oh, the horror, where's the ear bleach?
I agree I haven't seen so much buzz about a handgun since the SR1911 was introduced.For whatever reason, the R51 is getting a HUGE amount of buzz online, more than I've seen for any other new handgun in a long time.
For whatever reason, the R51 is getting a HUGE amount of buzz online, more than I've seen for any other new handgun in a long time.
It makes me wonder if a thumb-safety version is in the works, given that 2 of the gun's direct competitors- the Ruger LC9 and S&W Shield- have thumb safeties.gyvel said:Given that this is a single action gun, I'm not comfortable with the absence of a manual safety. Grip safeties are too easy to get pressed accidentally.