AK103,
I understand that holsters for those guns are available. But that doesn't mean that the Weaver rail design isn't harder on those holsters, as well as everything else they come in contact with.
And while a Sig's dust cover might be close to Weaver width, a 1911's is not.
My point is that the Weaver design is a terrible choice for a universal light mounting system for pistols. It is wide and sharp edged - working in direct opposition to how a handgun is supposed to handle - compact and smooth on the draw.
In encouraging universal mounts, we've ended up with about the worst mount possible. It would be relatively easy to come up with a mounting system that didn't even change the contours of a given gun, let alone make it wider, heavier and sharp.
I understand that holsters for those guns are available. But that doesn't mean that the Weaver rail design isn't harder on those holsters, as well as everything else they come in contact with.
And while a Sig's dust cover might be close to Weaver width, a 1911's is not.
My point is that the Weaver design is a terrible choice for a universal light mounting system for pistols. It is wide and sharp edged - working in direct opposition to how a handgun is supposed to handle - compact and smooth on the draw.
In encouraging universal mounts, we've ended up with about the worst mount possible. It would be relatively easy to come up with a mounting system that didn't even change the contours of a given gun, let alone make it wider, heavier and sharp.