Went looking for prices on the SR9c and found I could get a p95 for for almost exactly $100 less. They both look like good candidates. The SR9c looks a lot more comfortable to carry. The p95 seems to have a reputation for ruggedness and ease of use. I have to admit a bias toward Rugers. Has anyone handled these pistols?
I had the P95 for a while...
And while it was certainly not a bad pistol, it did have a few things that I didn't like:
The magazine release is too sharp and you have to push it forward, not inward.
The grip is too slippery (hence the rubber over the grip).
The trigger is not near as nice as the trigger on the SR9c.
The sights are not as nice as the sights on the SR9c.
I don't like the slide mounted decocker/safety that you flip up to fire and down for safe.
And the P95 is just more bulky overall.
I think the SR9c is just a better pistol in every way.
I also think that it's well worth the extra $$$.
And with the SR9c you get the option of a flush fitting 10-round magazine (most concealable)...
Or a pinky extension 10-round magazine (very concealable but with a better grip)...
Or the full grip 17-round magazine as seen in my earlier post.
And you also get a reversible rubber backstrap for different sized hands.
The backstrap is flush with the grip on one side, and has a "hump" on the other side.
The pic with the flush magazine has the backstrap set for a larger hand, while the pic with the pinky extension mag has the backstrap set for a smaller hand.
It's a subtle difference, but a noticeable one.
I prefer the "hump".
Good luck,
Gary