CZ75 or 92FS

TJB101

New member
Looking for a 4.5 to 5 inch SA/DA pistol. I have a P07 and a Sig225 ... really like the SA/DA guns but wanting a full size gun.

Any experience with the longer slide models? Doing the online reviews of the CZ75 and 92FS. Can’t decide. Any experience with those or other models. Really want to stay with a hammer SA/DA tool.

Thanks in advance to your thoughts.

Tim
 

sigarms228

New member
Both are fine pistols but you really need to try both out and see what works best for you or at minimum handle, rack the slide, and dry fire each. I have a CZ SP01 and like it but it is not my favorite and one reason is that it does not fit my larger hand/fingers as well as other options. You might want to check out the HK P30L too now that they are priced at around $600 or under if you don't mind another poly frame DA/SA pistol. SIG P226 is really sweet too but those go for a couple hundred or so more new for plain Jane models.
 
Last edited:

PatientWolf

New member
Try both, but if it were me, I’d lean strongly toward the CZ. I can mix models with and without a safety, but don’t like mixing safeties that go two different directions.
 

TJB101

New member
Try both, but if it were me, I’d lean strongly toward the CZ. I can mix models with and without a safety, but don’t like mixing safeties that go two different directions.


Really good point. I’d probably run the FS with safety off and decocked. The sig and CZ I own have no safeties
 

TJB101

New member
You might want to check out the HK P30L too now that they are priced at around $600 or under if you don't mind another poly frame DA/SA pistol. SIG P226 is really sweet too but those go for a couple hundred or so more new for plain Jane models.


Good stuff... will research the HK. I think the Sig may be contender but your right it’s priced a tad high.
 

NateKirk

New member
Personally I think the decocker safety feature on the Beretta is kind of cool, and for me they point better, but that being said, it's the CZ that I bought. I haven't had any problems with it.
 

TJB101

New member
Do you know who Jeff Cooper is? If not, you might want to do some research on him. He is only the greatest handgun instructor and combat shooter in human history. He chose the CZ-75 as his favorite 9mm. That speaks volumes. The Beretta? I can't think of anyone with half the reputation that would choose that firearm. There is a reason most in the military absolutely despise it. Just my $0.02. The Beretta is trash.


I’ll research him... thanks
 

TJB101

New member
Personally I think the decocker safety feature on the Beretta is kind of cool, and for me they point better, but that being said, it's the CZ that I bought. I haven't had any problems with it.


What was you reasons? Warranty? Capacity?
 

TunnelRat

New member
I think the vast majority of industry experts praise the CZ pistols as vastly superior to the Beretta 92. The CZ is lighter, slimmer, more ergonomic, more durable, more reliable, has a larger capacity magazine, points better, has the better grip, the safety/decocker or safety is in the right position, the list literally goes on and on and on. The Beretta was good for its day but there's a reason the military is ditching it. The CZ-75 is a tremendously better combat handgun.



The Berettas are just enormous for a 9mm pistol, bulky, heavy, and unwieldy. The grips fits few hands properly. Safety decocker is in the WRONG position (i.e. slide mounted) and can easily be accidentally hit during a tactical reload. The triggers are worse, bore axis is higher, magazine capacity is lower. Durability and reliability are lower and there are key parts such as the locking block that are known to shatter and lock up the guns. The military had to get rid of them, frankly they are just awful general issue combat sidearms. No comparison, the CZ-75 blows the Beretta 92 away in all regards.



Do you know who Jeff Cooper is? If not, you might want to do some research on him. He is only the greatest handgun instructor and combat shooter in human history. He chose the CZ-75 as his favorite 9mm. That speaks volumes. The Beretta? I can't think of anyone with half the reputation that would choose that firearm. There is a reason most in the military absolutely despise it.



Just my $0.02. The Beretta is trash.



I’m not sure if you realize it, but your sarcasm really doesn’t work a lot of times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

surveyor

New member
I almost bought a 92 inox, fondled it a time or 2, every time I fondled it I came back and held my cz 85 again. The grip is smaller on the cz in diameter.
I had a cz p07 as well. The 75 series is very similar in grip to the p07, so if you like the size and angle but want a heavier steel frame and a bit difference balance it is worth seeing how it feels.
 

puppyface

New member
I would try both and find out which one fits the hand. Personally, I bought both and sold the Beretta. It felt too big and not solid in the hand. The CZ is a real nice pistol. Of course this is all totally objective, one is not "better" than the other, depends on the operator and what feels right.
 

Overkill777

New member
I would much rather have a 92 with G conversion and D hammer spring than any CZ.

The D spring makes the trigger nice and slick, thr G mod converts the safety into a decocker only. It's perfect.

JIAgJbp_d.jpg


It's only bulky is you have tiny girl hands.
 

jsust

New member
I like my 92 inox and shoot it well but it is huge. The 92 is fat and the 75 is slender. Im sure it depends on your hand size as to which you would prefer.
 

armoredman

New member
I liked the Beretta 92 back in the day, was a great soft shooter, but it was very bulky for my medium sized mitts. It was quite accurate and reliable, even for being a range beater pistol. I prefer the fit and feel of the CZ-75 grip, myself, and have had great luck with CZ pistols.
If you like the P-07, have you laid a hand on the P-09?
 
Top