I wouldnt do it before 14 or so (ABout 7 or 8 for a bb gun though)....I know a guy who is 21 and just getting out of jail because he blew his friends head off while playing with daddys gun at age 12. Can you imagine that? The mental effects of
1-Killing your best friend
2-Being locked up for 9 years starting at age 12!
Personally I think anyone who starts kids at ages like 4, 5, 6 etc.... are irresponsible.
First, the story about the 21 year old you know is tragic. I just want to make that clear
However, your standpoint seems to be that because this person and his friend had this tragic accident at age 12, that means firearms are automatically an issue for anyone at this age. I disagree strongly, and it is not "irresponsible" to be a parent and be able to judge at which age a child is mature enough to do something like this-
with close adult supervision. A BB gun at age six or a .22 single shot rifle that is only in the child's hands when a responsible parent or two is present and closely supervising? Who am I to dictate age maturity and capability? The BB gun or .22 would not be regarded by the parents as another toy in the toy box, to be used when and how the child wants, and the parents are there when the thing is out, at all times no exceptions, and when either the safety speech or the 2 or three shot 'range trip' are over, the BB gun or rifle gets locked up. But little one never gets to actually shoot until he or she demonstrates that the safety aspect has sunk in. Maybe the process starts at 4, and maybe junior never shoots until he's 10
In the context of your idea that 14 is probably the lowest age...your viewpoint is based, it seems, on the 12 year old's accident you earlier described, that resulted in death
There is a
universe of difference between a couple of 12 year olds playing with a gun, and a 12 year old using a firearm under competent adult supervision. In my opinion- based on my gut feeling- the situation you describe came from "playing with guns"