what are the pros of all-metal-framed handguns?

simonrichter

New member
Despite the surge of poly handguns (there are even some revolvers in the meantime...), it appears that metal-framed handguns (steel, aluminium, maybe even zamac) are still defending a significant market share.

Is there any practical rationale behind an all-metal gun apart from aesthetics and the general appeal of classics that are simply made that way?
 

ligonierbill

New member
They're heavy. That's bad news for carrying, good news for shooting. I have two 40 S&W pistols, a Glock 23 and a recently acquired S&W 4006 (one of the CHP versions). The Glock is definitely livelier ("snappy"). Day at the range, take the 4006. But you'd want a duty belt to carry it. I think there is also a perception of durability, not warranted in my opinion.
 

kozak6

New member
Sure.

Zamak is readily die-cast, just like a Hot Wheels car.

Aluminum is readily CNC-ed. For a new pistol with an uncertain future, it might be cheaper to CNC the whole frame out of aluminum rather than to just CNC a subframe and sink six figures on poly frame production.

Probably the biggest advantage is that all metal guns are heavier, and heavier guns have less felt recoil.

Check out Sig's TXG grip module. Tungsten infused plastic.
 

peterg7

New member
Except for nostalgia I see no benefit.

I sold my 4566 to buy a Shield9 and now all my CC guns are plastic.

No looking back now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

stinkeypete

New member
Longevity. Check out the prices on 100 year old Smith and Wesson revolvers or 100 year old 1911's. Both shoot great. What do you think a 100 year old Glock will be worth as a shooter?

Metal to metal tight rail fit adds to accuracy and importantly adds to holding that accuracy as loose rails bounce about and get looser and looser with use. (*Accuracy measured as in a few inches at 50 yards and use is in the ten thousands of rounds)

Weight. Holding down recoil for following shots and soaking up recoil because your hand will thank you after a couple boxes of ammo.

The advantage of polymer pistols is low production cost and light weight. As time goes on, I can't see injection molding becoming a lost art. Gunsmithing is already a dying art yet the appreciation for a better handgun will be there. I think high end metal guns will continue to enjoy a higher resale value than plastic. Really, are Gen 1 glocks worth more than gen 3's?
 

NoSecondBest

New member
Other than weight for carry, there's no advantage to poly over steel. I own both and still like a well machined steel handgun for hunting and target shooting.
 

RickB

New member
I have a half-dozen all-steel handguns that are over 100 years old, and they function like new.
Let's see what a 120yo Glock looks like, and then decide how fantastic that plastic is.

The siding on my house had a 50yr warranty, on a product that had been in existence for only five years, and I look at the durability of plastic handgun parts with a similar bit of skepticism.
 

ballardw

New member
When you run out of ammo metal pistols make better impact weapons than plastic.

You can drive nails with steel pistols though easier with revolvers. Check your local Colt single action collector for tales of woe about finding pistols with evidence of this.
 

44 AMP

Staff
When you run out of ammo metal pistols make better impact weapons than plastic.

This is a point for me. When all else fails, when everything goes horribly wrong, your pistol IS an impact weapon. And, given that, admittedly remote, possibility, I prefer something with some heft to it, and am willing to put up with carrying something heavier, in order to have it.

(and if you don't think your pistol is an impact weapon, watch some of the old B&W Superman tv shows. Superman stands there, and lets bullets bounce off his mighty chest, but when the bad guy throws the empty gun at him, he ducks!!! :rolleyes::D
 

jar

New member
Made in 1906. Carried as my primary last week.

standard.jpg
 

DMK

New member
Full size steel frame, 22LR. Recoil is almost like shooting a pellet gun.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170209_094001315_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20170209_094001315_HDR.jpg
    280.7 KB · Views: 713

DMK

New member
125gr .357 magnum out of a lightweight alloy revolver? No thank you!

Out of this big chunk of stainless steel SP-101? That's a lot of fun! :)


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170219_080202386_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20170219_080202386_HDR.jpg
    194.1 KB · Views: 747
simonrichter said:
Is there any practical rationale behind an all-metal gun apart from aesthetics and the general appeal of classics that are simply made that way?
I view it the other way:

I own some all-metal handguns (other than the grips), and I own a couple or rifles that are metal actions with wood furniture. They have been doing their job for a good many years. Some of the handguns are approaching 100 years old, and my grandfathers old .22 rifle is more than a century old and still considerably more accurate than a relatively modern copy of the same design.

Why would I consider a plastic gun? Why should I consider a plastic gun? I have seen enough plastic products -- everything from roofing membranes to automobile parts to household appliances -- to know that plastics simply don't stand up to the test of time. The bottom line, for me, is that I simply don't trust plastic for something I may need to defend my life.
 

Forte S+W

New member
As much as I like all metal firearms, I can't help but roll my eyes whenever makes arguments in regards to longevity. Even if a Glock frame will fail within 100 years, what difference does it make? They're easily replaced at negligible cost.

Polymer framed pistols have been around since 1970, that was 50 years ago, and there are still plenty of old H&K VP70s in proper working order, so I can think of no reason to expect tbat the polymer used in more modern designs like the Glock won't last even longer.

Personally, I like metal-framed pistols better because they tend to be better shooters and that's good enough for me.
 

44 AMP

Staff
Other than I KNOW steel lasts, I don't see the longevity issue as a telling one. I don't buy pistols with the intent of future generations using them, though I expect they will be able to.

I've got 100+ year old firearms in perfect working order, and I'm not terribly concerned about how long a non metal frame pistol will last.

What concerns me more is what they are. And, what they are, isn't "my cuppa"...I've handled and shot several Glocks, M&Ps and similar styles and I don't care for them.

They're probably fine for people who's experience begins and ends with them, but I don't see how anyone who knows what a fine handgun is, would be happy with one.

If you're one of the "my gun is a tool and I don't give a crap about anything other than it working" guys, that's fine. I'm not.

Every metal frame pistol doesn't make my heart sing, but a few really do. Haven't seen a polymer frame one yet that stirs me beyond "meh..." and some don't even do that.

So, what's the advantage to a metal frame pistol? For me, its the fact that I LIKE THEM, and for me, that's what matters most.
 

peacefulgary

New member
The tree huggers tell me that a thin plastic grocery bag will take hundreds, if not thousands, of years to bio-degrade.

If this is even remotely true, I don't think a Glock frame will fail for at least 200 years.
Glock put steel where steel is needed and plastic where steel was not needed.
 

URIT

New member
I own some plastic but prefer all-metal pistols for both range and EDC.

I like the heft and sense of balance I get from my all-metal pistols. I also like the feedback or pulse I feel when shooting them. For me, it is easier to ride the recoil wave with my metal vs plastic pistols.

I suspect that carrying revolvers on and off duty for 33 years might have influenced me to lean toward the all-metal pistols.
 

ThomasT

New member
I like the looks and feel of an all metal gun. I just sent my son who lives in Florida my old S&W model 915 I got for almost free. He now wants a Canik or whatever they are called. In hind sight I should have sent him my SW9VE instead. I think he would have liked it better and I regret the loss of the 915. I like double action/single action autos.

There is just something about a well made steel gun. It says quality to me. I have three plastic framed guns and they do the job they were meant to do. But they just don't give me the pride of ownership I get with a metal gun.
 

Loupgarou

New member
My S&W K .38 Special Target Masterpiece. Made in 1955, before S&W began numbering its models. Shoots as new. Great range revolver.
 
Top