Wonderful to see all the new responses since my post last night. Thanks to everyone who posted!
Bob O, it was thoughtful of you to indulge my desire for photos. Your comments are valued as well. Really appreciate it.
Doyle said:
Exactly what I was wondering about. When you sit, things scrunch up a good deal down there, and room gets a lot less. If you are sitting in those blasted bucket seats, it's probably the worst case scenario. Just so I can get an idea, what's a Polish P-64 and how big (long) is it?
ZeSpectre said:
Sounds good so far. Deep concealment at the expense of accessibility will work for me. Of course it'd be nice to have both, but concealment is the priority here. If the Millenium Pro will fit well, then I have to believe a J-frame will as well. Even if the latter is a touch longer, it's less blocky than the Taurus, so maybe that will even the score. I'm hopeful.
rgates said:
What was the dummy gun? Was the model trying to convince people that they could carry a 5" 1911 down there? A Kahr PM9 versus a Hi-Power would be night and day, I should think. Did you catch the reactions/opinions of any others who were trying it out?
Southern_guy said:
Now, this is something I have never understood. Why do people think that a ND is any more likely with this carry method than with another? When the topic of SmartCarry or Thunderwear comes up, discussion of "mental blocks" and "anxiety" over carrying a weapon "down there" always follows sooner or later. Why? If you handle guns safely, they aren't going to fire themselves, whether on the belt, ankle, pocket or any other place. I have many questions and unaddressed concerns regarding SmartCarry, but this particular issue doesn't cause me one iota of worry. Frankly, it seems like a silly and purely emotional response to a nonexistent problem. Quite the contrary, I think if SmartCarry works for me, I'm going to feel all warm and fuzzy about having my piece down there .
Of course, maybe you were joking, but a didn't see an emoticon (not that one is needed). I'm not being dismissive of your comment, I'm just baffled because I've heard more or less the same many times before and never heard such a statement supported with any compelling arguments. Could you elaborate on why I'm soon going to be missing my rocket launchers ?
ATW and Erich said:
Ah yes, J-frame pocket carry. Been there, couldn't do that. Tried it with numerous holsters and there is no way to avoid either:
1) very obvious printing of the grip if a conventional holster is used, or
2) an unreasonably large "wallet" outline if using an oversized version of those holsters that place a rectangular piece of leather in front of the gun. On top of the extremely suspicious "huge wallet" look, the edges of the leather can't curl down around the outside of the gun in the grip area, which leaves it still sticking out like a sore thumb, as in 1) above, though of course the exact shape of it can't be detected. Just looks very weird and unnatural.
I certainly hope SmartCarry will be more discreet than pocket carry for a J-frame revolver. It has to be, right? There's a lot of room down there, now that I'm stopping to notice (yes, I know, let's try to keep this relatively serious ).
Bob O, it was thoughtful of you to indulge my desire for photos. Your comments are valued as well. Really appreciate it.
Doyle said:
I've got a smart carry. I've used it with my Polish P-64. As long as I'm standing, it is great. The problem is when I get in the car. The angle makes sitting in the car with it on uncomfortable.
Exactly what I was wondering about. When you sit, things scrunch up a good deal down there, and room gets a lot less. If you are sitting in those blasted bucket seats, it's probably the worst case scenario. Just so I can get an idea, what's a Polish P-64 and how big (long) is it?
ZeSpectre said:
Firstly, it's DEEP concealment. The good side of that is you can carry just about anyplace (unless they have a metal detector). The bad side is that retrieval is VERY slow (and damned near impossible with a seatbelt on).
On the other hand my Taurus Millennium Pro fits fine and I can carry that whenever with no discomfort, it just falls into place.
Sounds good so far. Deep concealment at the expense of accessibility will work for me. Of course it'd be nice to have both, but concealment is the priority here. If the Millenium Pro will fit well, then I have to believe a J-frame will as well. Even if the latter is a touch longer, it's less blocky than the Taurus, so maybe that will even the score. I'm hopeful.
rgates said:
I was at a gun show where a guy was showing and demonstrating the Smart Carry. Was actually letting people try it with a rubber dummy gun. I gave it a try and there is no way. The dummy gun was not nearly as heavy as even my Makarov and was about the most uncomfortable device I think I have ever tried. I tried to sit with it but on the way down was causing too much pain so I never made it all the way down...The guy demonstrating the thing's pants were so baggy he could have gained 75lbs. and still wouldn't be tight.
What was the dummy gun? Was the model trying to convince people that they could carry a 5" 1911 down there? A Kahr PM9 versus a Hi-Power would be night and day, I should think. Did you catch the reactions/opinions of any others who were trying it out?
Southern_guy said:
You are going to blow your nuts off with that holster system.
Now, this is something I have never understood. Why do people think that a ND is any more likely with this carry method than with another? When the topic of SmartCarry or Thunderwear comes up, discussion of "mental blocks" and "anxiety" over carrying a weapon "down there" always follows sooner or later. Why? If you handle guns safely, they aren't going to fire themselves, whether on the belt, ankle, pocket or any other place. I have many questions and unaddressed concerns regarding SmartCarry, but this particular issue doesn't cause me one iota of worry. Frankly, it seems like a silly and purely emotional response to a nonexistent problem. Quite the contrary, I think if SmartCarry works for me, I'm going to feel all warm and fuzzy about having my piece down there .
Of course, maybe you were joking, but a didn't see an emoticon (not that one is needed). I'm not being dismissive of your comment, I'm just baffled because I've heard more or less the same many times before and never heard such a statement supported with any compelling arguments. Could you elaborate on why I'm soon going to be missing my rocket launchers ?
ATW and Erich said:
I find that I prefer a J frame in a pocket when I can't wear a belt holster, though. Same level of discreet as Smartcarry and much easier to access.
This is a real advantage over the pocket holster method - I have difficulty drawing from a pocket holster when I'm belted into my vehicle. Nevertheless, I use pocket holsters more frequently than SmartCarry - as I said in post #7 supra, it's not the most comfortable method of carry, though it's very low-pro (my wife also cannot tell when I'm SmartCarrying).
Ah yes, J-frame pocket carry. Been there, couldn't do that. Tried it with numerous holsters and there is no way to avoid either:
1) very obvious printing of the grip if a conventional holster is used, or
2) an unreasonably large "wallet" outline if using an oversized version of those holsters that place a rectangular piece of leather in front of the gun. On top of the extremely suspicious "huge wallet" look, the edges of the leather can't curl down around the outside of the gun in the grip area, which leaves it still sticking out like a sore thumb, as in 1) above, though of course the exact shape of it can't be detected. Just looks very weird and unnatural.
I certainly hope SmartCarry will be more discreet than pocket carry for a J-frame revolver. It has to be, right? There's a lot of room down there, now that I'm stopping to notice (yes, I know, let's try to keep this relatively serious ).