• Anything ‘published’ on the web is viewed as intellectual property and, regardless of whether it displays a copyright symbol or not, is therefore copyrighted by the originator. The only exception to this is if there is a “free and unrestricted reuse” statement associated with the work.

    In order to protect our members and TFL from possible litigation, all members must abide by the following new rules:

    1. Copying and pasting entire articles from another site to TFL is strictly prohibited. The same applies to articles from print or other media, and to posting photographs taken of copyrighted pages or other media.

    2. Copyright law provides for “fair use” of portions of a copyrighted work. You can copy no more than a SINGLE paragraph from the article to your post (3 or 4 sentences at most).

    3. You must provide a link to the article along with the name of website. For example: ww.xxx.yyy/zzz (The Lower Thumbsuck Daily News).

    4. You must provide, in your own words, a brief summary of the article AND your reasons for believing it will be of interest to TFL members. Failure to do so may result in the thread being closed or your post being deleted as a “cut and paste drive by.”

    5. Photographs and other images are also copyrighted. "Hotlinking" of images (so that it appears in your message) from other sites is also prohibited unless you own rights to the image. If you wish to share an image, provide a clickable link to it.

    Posts that do not follow these new guidelines will be altered or deleted by staff. Members who continue to violate this policy may lose their posting privileges at TFL.

    Thank you for your cooperation and your participation in TFL, the leading online forum for firearms enthusiasts.

Think the moderators are unfair??? READ THIS BEFORE POSTING YOUR GRIPE.

CrustyFN

New member
Please no forum bashing either
I'm not bashing GT. I spend a lot of time there. I was just pointing out the difference.
the staff members are human, not perfect. So besides brown nosing I don't see the point of this thread.
Then I guess there is no point in replying to you since this is a senseless thread you won't be reading it again.
 

rem33

Moderator
If you disagree with a moderator's decision, send him/her a PM. You can expect to get a good hearing and If you make a good case for your point of view, appropriate measures will be taken.

Yes, but when you have had a post edited without knowing who or why it was done it is kinda hard to send a PM to the mod.
I've had this happen and not being a very politically correct type of person it is easy to see why, and if what I had said, was not acceptable. Fine, but if mine or any other post is edited wouldn't it be a OK idea for the mod to leave a short note as to who and why?
 
"Yes, but when you have had a post edited without knowing who or why it was done it is kinda hard to send a PM to the mod."

OK, that is, in my opinion, a valid observation.

A number of times (maybe 4 or 5) over the years my posts have been edited with no explanation why. I only know that something I put into the post is now missing.

Most of the time, though, I've been contacted and either given the opportunity to edit my own post if it's something objectionable, or have received a PM stating the reasons why my post was edited.
 
Hmmmmmm...............

.....I have noticed that a lot of threads get padlocked for a variety of reasons, and in most cases, an explanation is given. All of us are invited guests on these forums, and the reality is that one is not free to run wild with a host of what if's, and would you do this, or do you agree with that, or which is better, ad nauseum...the bottom line....the party is over when the host says it's over...not real hard to understand.;)
 

JohnKSa

Administrator
Yes, but when you have had a post edited without knowing who or why it was done it is kinda hard to send a PM to the mod.
If I had a post edited without knowing who did it, I'd PM one (or all) of the mods of the particular subforum that the post was in. They're listed on the extreme right of the subforum index.
 

C Philip

New member
To the original poster:
You overlook the fact that the thread which your example post is from was reopened.
 

Mal H

Staff
But, C Philip, that was precisely John's point. A thread was closed; a PM to the moderator stating the case for the thread was sent; the thread was re-opened after due consideration.
 
Threads should never be closed at TFL without reason. Other than Trolling, posts should never be edited without explanation, either in a footnote to the post or PM to the Member.

If there are valid claims that such is happening anonymously, Staff would like to know. Personally, I've yet to witness any such case.
Rich
 

skeeter1

New member
Once in a blue moon, I've been chastised by one of the mods. And you know what? I couldn't disagree with them. They were right.

Enjoy the forums. These are the best I've found.
 

zzirg

New member
there are those of us who can tell you the molecular componants that make up a steel barrel ,does that mean we should rule out those who only know what pistol the barrel is made for? I am most likely not making freinds here by saying this but some how it seems to me that a lot of people must have been born with the knowledge they have.These days instead of reading a book or asking their dad a question young people are using the computor and forums just like these to get their answers to their questions.I think they all deserve answers to their questions no matter what......there is no such thing as a ignorant question.
 

Mal H

Staff
Excellent point, zzirg, and food for thought for the next time anyone feels the need to put down a questioner for what seems like a silly or trollish question.
 

38splfan

New member
Points.

On that most recent point, I try very hard not to bash or object to a question, lest it be an obvious troll (sales, anti, advertising for airsoft, etc).
However, for obvious questions, I do like to encourage the use of the search bar first. If you can't find an answer there, or need new or refreshed info, then post and most will be happy to oblige.

Venture over to the SKS boards and you'll be amazed at the most popular threads, and come to really appreciate proactive moderation. One of my favorites was a two page thread started by a guy asking how to go about filling/sealing HP's with mercury. There's also another 3 or 4 pager on fallout shelters.

I think the reason that the moderators seem so "lock happy" to some people here is that they are trying to avoid that type of crap. Every year, things get a little tighter for gun owners. Like it or not all of our recent victories, even the sunset of the '94 ban, have been small in comparison to what is attempted every session of Congress. Concurrently, new boards are popping up all the time, and many of them do nothing but reinforce the view of gun owners as right-wing extremist facist hillbilly idiots.

I think that the mods here are trying to provide a professional, controlled, legitimate representation of gun owners as level-headed and law-abiding citizens who play a legitimate role in mainstream society.

It may come off a bit harsh to people at times, but they seem to be truly interested in a positive portrayal of the firearms community, so cheers to them for their efforts.
 
Top