Gonzo,
The S&W-style revolver, as I have CONSISTENTLY been saying, if anyone would bother to read my posts, wins by more than just a LITTLE.
The 1911 and its clones can't even come remotely close to matching the number of S&W-style revolvers that have been produced. Quite frankly, no firearm can. The Smith & Wesson revolver design is the most copied, most produced handgun design in history.
Your counter argument about "professionals" is also a non-producer, in reality. No, the S&W revolver doesn't enjoy the popularity that it once did, but S&W & S&W-type revolver sales remain extremely strong.
But then again, the 1911 doesn't enjoy the popularity that it once did, either. There's a dirty little secrete of the Wonder9 invasion of the 1980s. It didn't just drop revolver sales to the basement, it also dropped sales of the 1911 way far off of what they were.
The US Military switched away from it nearly 2 decades ago. No major police force carries it -- some speciality units do -- the the vast majority of all police now carry guns that had their origin in Europe.
Who are these "professionals" that you claim? A few dozen gun writers? Sorry, not a winner, either. If they truly had the clout you claimed, no one in the US would be carrying anything BUT a 1911. And, more importantly, a few "professionals" using 1911s now constitutes a personal preference, a snapshot in time, as it were.
A few ill-defined "professionals" don't really set the entire standard. For instance, would you consider Elmer Keith, Bill Jordan, or Ed McGivern professionals? Those men all had access to 1911s, but all used/were most associated with Smith & Wesson revovlers.
If I were to pick a single, narrow criteria, as many in this discussion have, as the sole arbiter of "success," I could make a convincing case that the Yugo was the most successful car ever designed, or that Adolf Hitler was the most successful national leader ever to walk the earth. But what about all of those nasty elements, you might ask? Well, they don't support my case for "success," so they should arbitrarily be rejected as non-players.
Sorry, that's a game of 3-card Monty that no one here should be willing to buy.
As I've noted, the full some of a handgun's impact should be measured -- acceptance, production, adoption, impact, and emulation.
If you take those criteria and judge them as a whole, there are very few, if any, that can come close to matching the S&W revolver design.
Let's face it, there's no doubt that I'm a big fan of the S&W revolver. But even if I weren't, I'd still look at the situation objectively, look at the criteria that I've laid out above, and arrive at the same conclusion.
The numbers simply don't lie. The estimated 50 to 75 MILLION S&W and S&W-type revolvers that have been produced over the last 100 years, their world-wide distribution (at one time makers in Spain were making more S&W-type revolvers than S&W was), guarantee it it's place as the most successful handgun design ever.