-
Anything ‘published’ on the web is viewed as intellectual property and, regardless of whether it displays a copyright symbol or not, is therefore copyrighted by the originator. The only exception to this is if there is a “free and unrestricted reuse” statement associated with the work.
In order to protect our members and TFL from possible litigation, all members must abide by the following new rules:
1. Copying and pasting entire articles from another site to TFL is strictly prohibited. The same applies to articles from print or other media, and to posting photographs taken of copyrighted pages or other media.
2. Copyright law provides for “fair use” of portions of a copyrighted work. You can copy no more than a SINGLE paragraph from the article to your post (3 or 4 sentences at most).
3. You must provide a link to the article along with the name of website. For example: ww.xxx.yyy/zzz (The Lower Thumbsuck Daily News).
4. You must provide, in your own words, a brief summary of the article AND your reasons for believing it will be of interest to TFL members. Failure to do so may result in the thread being closed or your post being deleted as a “cut and paste drive by.”
5. Photographs and other images are also copyrighted. "Hotlinking" of images (so that it appears in your message) from other sites is also prohibited unless you own rights to the image. If you wish to share an image, provide a clickable link to it.
Posts that do not follow these new guidelines will be altered or deleted by staff. Members who continue to violate this policy may lose their posting privileges at TFL.
Thank you for your cooperation and your participation in TFL, the leading online forum for firearms enthusiasts.
TFL dying?
- Thread starter baddarryl
- Start date
- Status
Well, it's certainly slowed down quite a lot over the last decade or so, but dying? No.
The one statistic I look at for that aspect is the number of active members, and that has remained just about constant for a long time - well over 5 years.
(An active member is one who logs in at least once in a month's time.)
The one statistic I look at for that aspect is the number of active members, and that has remained just about constant for a long time - well over 5 years.
(An active member is one who logs in at least once in a month's time.)
Electrod47
New member
quote..TFL dying?
Hi. I don't mean to be crass but it seems like the forum is losing activity. Is there anything to that? I like it here and hope we can make a difference. Thanks.
Bored already?.....
Hi. I don't mean to be crass but it seems like the forum is losing activity. Is there anything to that? I like it here and hope we can make a difference. Thanks.
Bored already?.....
Not dying in the sense of being on the edge of no longer existing, but indeed slowing down, like a lot of us.
The internet forum is a leftover from earlier days, just like the Listserv and usenet groups - still viable but newer things are available now, so the traffic gets spread thinner.
I still read TFL every day because it is valuable. But I do not bother logging in unless I have something to post, which is infrequent - other people have more facts than I do, and usually state them more clearly and with less rambling.
The internet forum is a leftover from earlier days, just like the Listserv and usenet groups - still viable but newer things are available now, so the traffic gets spread thinner.
I still read TFL every day because it is valuable. But I do not bother logging in unless I have something to post, which is infrequent - other people have more facts than I do, and usually state them more clearly and with less rambling.
There are plenty of active gun-related forums out there. The active ones seem to have a focused rifle type; FAL, AK, AR, or a regional focus like INGO. Social media tends to restrict these topics, so here were are./
If you want to see what death looks like then view gunco.net
If you want to see what death looks like then view gunco.net
Last edited:
Less active, yes, but reports of it's death are greatly exaggerated. 
I still scroll through TFL "New Posts" most days. Some topics, if there are already comments that I would ditto someone else, I'll just pass on by. I used to be on a lot of forums, and some I have not been back to in years. It's a time thing, and yes, so many formats so spread thinner.
I do spend more time on another forum that is more active, but also slowing a bit since CV became less of a thing. But half my time there is moderating. But TFL is 2nd as far and check ins and time for me.
One thing I do really like about other forums is the ability to respond (Like, Love, helpful, sad, etc.) to posts. Wish we had that here at TFL.
I still scroll through TFL "New Posts" most days. Some topics, if there are already comments that I would ditto someone else, I'll just pass on by. I used to be on a lot of forums, and some I have not been back to in years. It's a time thing, and yes, so many formats so spread thinner.
I do spend more time on another forum that is more active, but also slowing a bit since CV became less of a thing. But half my time there is moderating. But TFL is 2nd as far and check ins and time for me.
One thing I do really like about other forums is the ability to respond (Like, Love, helpful, sad, etc.) to posts. Wish we had that here at TFL.
I still see it as a valuable tool and visit almost daily. I have noticed fewer, I don't know how to word it, but maybe less serious Posts. There don't seem to be as many folks trying to create controversy. Also, regrettably, there seem to be fewer Posts from new enthusiasts. Anyway, just my casual observation.
Shane Tuttle
Staff
Dying? No.
Slowing down? Absolutely.
Speculation of why? If you look at most respected forums out there, firearms or otherwise, their traffic has slowed down, as well. Many gravitate towards social media for Q & A and "discussions". People want to spend less time typing up questions involving long conversations and those that answer even less to respond. I believe the demographic of communication shifted sharply when Apps started to hit phones. People used to sit down at their computer or even laptop to have long, detailed discussions here. Now, most people use their cell phones. Not as many are going to spend that kind of time on a venue such as ours to type up well thought out comments using their phones. This place isn't an emoji-filled chat room with abbreviations dominating comments. That's the price we pay. But I personally wouldn't want our venue to change. You'll find fewer childish empty comments and more intellectual conversations.
Slowing down? Absolutely.
Speculation of why? If you look at most respected forums out there, firearms or otherwise, their traffic has slowed down, as well. Many gravitate towards social media for Q & A and "discussions". People want to spend less time typing up questions involving long conversations and those that answer even less to respond. I believe the demographic of communication shifted sharply when Apps started to hit phones. People used to sit down at their computer or even laptop to have long, detailed discussions here. Now, most people use their cell phones. Not as many are going to spend that kind of time on a venue such as ours to type up well thought out comments using their phones. This place isn't an emoji-filled chat room with abbreviations dominating comments. That's the price we pay. But I personally wouldn't want our venue to change. You'll find fewer childish empty comments and more intellectual conversations.
FrankenMauser
New member
I have been here for 15 years now.
I have been other places, on and off, for varying shorter times.
I now spend my "forum time" helping a couple businesses that engage in other ways and primarily attract a younger demographic.
My opinion, especially with my day-to-day exposing me more to Zoomers and Millennials in the gun world, is as follows:
Younger generations see forums as antiquated repositories of Boomerisms and far too slow for the immediate answer that modern technology allows them to get on other subjects.
They do search forums and read posts as "guests", because they know that useful information is buried within.
But they don't like taking part and don't sign up, unless to get some photos that they saw previews of in a google image search. They hate wading through the Boomerisms and ridiculous 5-page posts about some particular member's history with [X] rifle, just to see that they never answered the question, "Should my trigger have a little horn here? This one seems modified."
They hate asking a question, only to be berated for buying a stupid gun that they knew was stupid.
They hate asking a direct, pointed question, only to see zero replies for weeks, because no one else ever stepped back to ask, "Why is [that] the way it is?"
They hate the rants. They hate the tangents. They just hate forums, because they represent Boomers. And Zoomers (and many Millennials) just hate Boomers.
They are using other things now. Slack, Quora, Slingshot, Mumble, MeWe groups, Discord, Facebook groups, Twitter, Reddit, and more.
All of them have better response times than forums (even if the information is false and worthless), and many offer the equivalent of 24/7 live chat -- because that is pretty much what some of them are, just live, logged chat.
As Boomers die, there is no new blood to replace them on forums.
Boomers, Gen X, the lost generation, and Millennials, in their respective numbers, are all that is left.
As we leave, the numbers just dwindle. Zoomers rejoice as forums implode, disappear, and take with them decades of valuable information (but also a lot of garbage).
Zoomers are driving current trends in group communication, and they just hate forums.
It does not help that a huge number of popular forums have been sold to corporate entities in the last 5 years, resulting in the use of new forum software that has even more tracking abilities (bad - Zoomers hate this more than we do) and forcing even more ads down their throats - even if paying members of some special rank that reduces ads.
Zoomers hate forums. So the active member number will dwindle as the number still alive follows the sled ride down the back side of its Bell curve.
I have been other places, on and off, for varying shorter times.
I now spend my "forum time" helping a couple businesses that engage in other ways and primarily attract a younger demographic.
My opinion, especially with my day-to-day exposing me more to Zoomers and Millennials in the gun world, is as follows:
Younger generations see forums as antiquated repositories of Boomerisms and far too slow for the immediate answer that modern technology allows them to get on other subjects.
They do search forums and read posts as "guests", because they know that useful information is buried within.
But they don't like taking part and don't sign up, unless to get some photos that they saw previews of in a google image search. They hate wading through the Boomerisms and ridiculous 5-page posts about some particular member's history with [X] rifle, just to see that they never answered the question, "Should my trigger have a little horn here? This one seems modified."
They hate asking a question, only to be berated for buying a stupid gun that they knew was stupid.
They hate asking a direct, pointed question, only to see zero replies for weeks, because no one else ever stepped back to ask, "Why is [that] the way it is?"
They hate the rants. They hate the tangents. They just hate forums, because they represent Boomers. And Zoomers (and many Millennials) just hate Boomers.
They are using other things now. Slack, Quora, Slingshot, Mumble, MeWe groups, Discord, Facebook groups, Twitter, Reddit, and more.
All of them have better response times than forums (even if the information is false and worthless), and many offer the equivalent of 24/7 live chat -- because that is pretty much what some of them are, just live, logged chat.
As Boomers die, there is no new blood to replace them on forums.
Boomers, Gen X, the lost generation, and Millennials, in their respective numbers, are all that is left.
As we leave, the numbers just dwindle. Zoomers rejoice as forums implode, disappear, and take with them decades of valuable information (but also a lot of garbage).
Zoomers are driving current trends in group communication, and they just hate forums.
It does not help that a huge number of popular forums have been sold to corporate entities in the last 5 years, resulting in the use of new forum software that has even more tracking abilities (bad - Zoomers hate this more than we do) and forcing even more ads down their throats - even if paying members of some special rank that reduces ads.
Zoomers hate forums. So the active member number will dwindle as the number still alive follows the sled ride down the back side of its Bell curve.
Aguila Blanca
Staff
^^^ What he said.
And it isn't just forum-type Internet sites that are seeing a decline. Yesterday I met a gentleman who turned out to be the incoming commander of my state's VFW organization. (I'm a life member of the VFW.) I mentioned that I have transitioned to being an at-large member because my town's post disbanded several years ago, then two years later the post to which I was transferred in a neighboring town also disbanded, so the VFW assigned me to a post in a town miles from home, where I don't know anyone and have no reason to go to.
He sympathized. His post is still viable, but he said in general the VFW and similar organizations are losing membership because the people coming out of the military today are not oriented to thinking about what they can offer to fellow veterans, they are only interested in what they can get.
Sad commentary, but I think it's an accurate assessment of what's wrong with the country today.
And it isn't just forum-type Internet sites that are seeing a decline. Yesterday I met a gentleman who turned out to be the incoming commander of my state's VFW organization. (I'm a life member of the VFW.) I mentioned that I have transitioned to being an at-large member because my town's post disbanded several years ago, then two years later the post to which I was transferred in a neighboring town also disbanded, so the VFW assigned me to a post in a town miles from home, where I don't know anyone and have no reason to go to.
He sympathized. His post is still viable, but he said in general the VFW and similar organizations are losing membership because the people coming out of the military today are not oriented to thinking about what they can offer to fellow veterans, they are only interested in what they can get.
Sad commentary, but I think it's an accurate assessment of what's wrong with the country today.
FrankenMauser
New member
The sad thing about the massive transition to alternate forms of communication - primarily modern "social media" - is that it is nearly impossible to search and some forms purge the history after designated amounts of time.
Among other losses....
There are some incredible discussions being had about discoveries in firearms development, individual war stories that went unseen, and cartridge evolution, across several (private) social media servers. Several *could* become books, but probably won't.
Yet, no one (else) can see it, no one can search it, and the evolution of the discovery and subsequent discoveries based on that information will eventually be purged and lost in the nether as the server sends magical pixies to delete the file entry and allow over-writing.
Among other losses....
There are some incredible discussions being had about discoveries in firearms development, individual war stories that went unseen, and cartridge evolution, across several (private) social media servers. Several *could* become books, but probably won't.
Yet, no one (else) can see it, no one can search it, and the evolution of the discovery and subsequent discoveries based on that information will eventually be purged and lost in the nether as the server sends magical pixies to delete the file entry and allow over-writing.
That is occurring in all fields. The desire to write/publish works in hard copy or in a format that will remain, has diminished greatly. We are in a process of losing great swaths of developmental procedures for technological advancements since the McD mentality says we already have it. Totalitarianism's footprint won't let it come back I fear.
This forum software makes simple tasks more difficult than other versions. When looking at sites like Shotgunworld or the 2 S&W forums, the ability to easily quote another poster, post pics, etc. is MUCH easier to do and easier to navigate. I think that adds somewhat to the slowing down on sites like this one
That is the BIGGEST thing for me.
Aguila Blanca
Staff
This is not a function of the vBulletin software, or the version. I have been a participant in a number of other forums that run vBulletin, including the same version that we use here. Long before I was invited to become a moderator, the administrators of this site decided to deactivate the quote function. It's there in the software, but TFL keeps it turned off.FITASC said:
No, I don't know why.
That said, quoting isn't difficult. Highlight the text you want to quote, go to the response window, click the little icon for "Quote," and paste the text between the "quote" tags.
You can quote with the persons name you're quoting but it's a more convoluted process than most forums. I don't spend a lot of time here. I'm 66 and I prefer a forum that's not as straight laced as this one.
Aguila Blanca
Staff
Yes, you can do it -- as I just did here. I do it regularly. The point is that the software we use, vBulletin, has that function built into it but the function is disabled on The Firing Line. To quote on TFL requires a couple of manual steps that aren't needed on most forums that run vBulletin.Hawg said:
- Status