If you are satisfied with your Taurus, as some of the recent posts imply, your are but a "Taurus lover", and your actual experiences with it are invalid. If you prefer a S&W however, you are a sophisticated connoisseur of fine guns who can voice subjective platitudes without detailed examples or particulars.
My S.S. Taurus 85 came with a wide, smooth trigger that was light enough (not very heavy from the factory), and the rubber stocks that came with it fit my hand making it very shootable. On the other hand, a S&W 36 (serial number indicates 1982 mfg.-"new, kept in a sock.) came with a narrow grooved trigger, that was way too heavy to use as was, had rough hammer pin boss that was cutting into the steel of the hammer, had to polish, change springs (hammer and rebound), swapped out the trigger for wider, ground and polished the grooves off, removed burrs that rubbed on the trigger, although greatly improved, still ended up with a trigger that was not nearly as nice as the Taurus came with from the factory and needed no alteration or improvements.
As to the Taurus lock-work, if they wanted to copy S&W's, the patent has long ago run out...nothing would stop them. However, the lock-work has been redesigned and modernized (less friction points...no rebound slide, no side-plate slot-hammer block friction), resulting in a superb trigger pull compared to the early 1900's design of the S&W that must be polished, deburred, and tuned before it is useful, and then, it still is not as good.
Please do not call me a Taurus lover...I own but one taurus compared to three S&W's (currently). That makes me a S&W lover.