Personally, I hate threads like this.
Any picture of a pretty woman immediately brings out public slobbering by a bunch of the fellas.
Then the "that's-not-appropriate" crowd steps in with their moral reprimands.
Each side presents extremist views as either "human nature" or "morally correct" and states anyone who doesn't agree with them is hurting our Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
To the droolers:
Please drool privately or elsewhere. Yes, the female form in its ideal state is lovely to behold. No, we don't need to hear which is your favorite, why she's your favorite, or your fantasies concerning your imaginary involvement with her.
Furthermore, anyone who goes shooting in shorts, sandals, or a shirt with an open neck is not real bright considering hot shell casings and (in most cases) flying insects, etc.
To the censors:
Take care of yourself, your family and your friends. If a picture of a handsome man or a comely woman offends you, don't look. Turn off the TV. Cancel your magazine subscriptions.
I agree that sex is used too much in advertising but it is an attention-getter. Even those who despise the concept are attentive to the ads (if only to "be offended") and still buy the products. If the ads offend you, write the TV station, the magazine editors, and the advertisers.
But when a beautiful woman or a handsome man puts her(his) body on display, do not assume they're being exploited.
- They probably are earning more money than you and I put together.
- They probably care too much about their bodies to engage in promiscuous sex.
- It is their decision - one you have no Right to interfere with.
- To assume they are ignorant, stupid, and/or uneducated is engaging in the very stereotyping you claim to abhor.
My oldest daughter is a part-time model.
- She is not immoral and dresses at least as well (even when modeling) as most people I've seen in church.
- She is not inept with a firearm. She can shoot rather well, field strip her personally-owned semi-auto, clean it properly and store it safely. She understands, for example, the difference between a .45 auto and a .45 Long Colt.
- She is not brain dead. It is her involvement with her major work as a Secretary/Recorder for county government and her duties as a wife and mother that prevent her from returning to college and getting her degree.
(By the way, she's a lot smarter, more successful and more practical than many of us WITH college degrees!)
-----
Furthermore, to both sides, if you go to the range or avoid going to the range because of how other people are dressed, I suggest you investigate your own moral fiber and ability to make your own decisions.
Ohhh, there is more I'd like to say.... much more. But I'll let it rest for the moment with a single comment.
Those of us who believe in Constitutional Law and the Right to Keep and Bear Arms are a large and diverse group of people. We are not one-dimensional clones of each other. Therefore, we will have differing beliefs, attitudes, and moral values. Most assuredly, we even will have differing views on how to restore our Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
However, if we waste our time being divisive, stressing our differences instead of our similar RKBA views, we will remain divided and ineffective. We then will lose our struggle for freedom and our differing views will become truly irrelevant as our paternalistic, elitist government will decide what views and moral values will be implemented.
Let's skip the lusting and the moralizing. Ben Franklin was correct, "We must hang together or we shall most surely hang separately." Let's get back to our struggle to restore freedom in America - and remember - to HAVE freedom, you must PERMIT freedom. Though that surely includes your freedom to speak your mind, I ask - no I plead - that you determine whether your comments unite or divide our ranks, whether your comments strengthen or weaken our RKBA or whether your comments only strengthen and support your ego.