Ruger SR9 First Range Report

Boarhunter

New member
I was not the only one attracted to Larry's Pistol & Pawn; Huntsville, Alabama ("Where every day is a gun show!"), on Saturday to see and shoot Ruger's newest 9 mm, the SR9. There was a good crowd, with a number of us arriving before the store even opened. Being a fairly committed 1911 man (though I dabbled with an AR-24 recently), I went to the store with every intention of being dissatisfied with the product.

But I was not. And bought one of the "limited edition" packages, consisting of a relatively low serial number... mine is 3XX... and an engraved tactical knife, all priced at $499. As has been mentioned elsewhere in this forum, Larry was also taking pre-orders for regular production guns for $399, as I recall.

I will not repeat the gun's specifications as they are now available on Ruger's web page.

But these are my preliminary thoughts having handled the gun only a short time and having put only 75 rounds downrange.

First, it is not a plastic 1911. It does not have the crisp single-action trigger pull of high-dollar 1911s (nor does it have a high-dollar price tag!). The trigger pull is smoother and lighter, though, than is found on many double-action-only pistols on the market today.

And it does have a manual ambidextrous safety, though significantly smaller than is found on your typical "combat" 1911. (I would sure like to see Ruger modify the safety so you can rest a thumb on it while shooting.)

The magazine release is where you would expect to find it and comfortable to use. And as a bonus, it too is ambidextrous. The magazines drop free without hangup, whether loaded or not.

Speaking of magazines, it is virtually impossible to load the magazines without the included mag loader. No exaggeration. You simply cannot get the cartridges into the magazines without the included mechanical loader. That may be one of the most significant downsides to the package.

The adjustable sights are nice and much appreciated. I recently purchased an Armalite AR-24, which shot approximately 2 inches low at 20 yards. I was unable to find any after-market sights for the gun, nor was Armalite able to help me with replacement sights. Having nice low-profile adjustable sights is a blessing as this gun too shoots a bit low. But that problem will be cured the next time I go to the range.

How did it shoot? Very well, thank you.

I took the gun from the sales counter straight to the indoor range and ran 75 rounds through it over a very short period of time. No lubrication other than what was on it from the factory. Not a single bobble. None. Zero. And although I did not attempt any "accuracy" testing from a bench, it appears to be a very nice shooter. I would say that it shoots (at least for me) virtually as well as any of the various 1911s that I own.

I have not taken the time to compare specs on the various plastic hi-cap 9s, but this Ruger SR9 seems extraordinarily thin in the grips, and I like that much. The gun almost feels like a 1911 with thin grips rather than a block of 2x4 pine.

Rumor has it that it will fit in Glock 17 holsters. That would sure be nice, and I plan to test the rumor first of the week.

For those of you interested in IDPA, I am assuming that it will be classified as an SSP gun and not as an ESP gun since, at least according to the included manual, the trigger actually retracts the striker a bit prior to it being released.

Field stripping the gun took all of five minutes (at most), and that included reading the disassembly instructions in the manual. It is fairly straightforward and easy to accomplish. No tools are required.

Finally, one of the promoted features of the gun is the reversible backstrap. From the factory, the backstrap "bulges" a bit like the 1911A1; pop out a plastic pin and the backstrap can be reversed giving a flat profile (my personal preference). I did make the change on my firearm, and it took all of two minutes and a paper clip (again, including the time it took to read the instructions).

In summary, do not expect the gun to the a plastic 1911. But aside from the significant difficulty in loading the magazines, the gun is a "keeper." I like it pretty good.

Recommended changes: First, fix the magazines so they can be loaded by hand; second, extend the safety so that the shooter can get a high grip and ride the safety with the thumb.

I plan to put a lot of ammo through the SR9 over the next couple of weeks, and I will keep you posted.

Boarhunter
 

Jim Watson

New member
I will be interested to see your example, the only other paying customer review I have seen called the trigger action "gritty."

About 25 years ago, Jeff Cooper praised the trigger of his Bren Ten and said that modern machining centers would make good mass produced triggers commonplace. Sorry, Jeff. Modern machining centers have mostly been used to lay off skilled machinists and fear of liability has made the three pound trigger a custom gunsmith project, often with waivers to be signed.
 

SDDL-UP

New member
Apparently my last thread "Who wants a Ruger" got censored, so I'll just ask here. Is ruger still shipping all their guns with ten round magazines?

I own Ruger guns but don't appreciate their policy of selling ten round nagazines to anyone that's not LE... if that's still what's going on.

Thanks for the review!
 

JohnKSa

Administrator
Your last thread, "Who wants a Ruger" was primarily a commentary and discussion on Ruger products and policies in general and therefore it was moved to the proper section of the forum.

It was not censored, and you have posted on it since the move so I'm not sure what your complaint is.
 

Boarhunter

New member
Jim,

Right after the shipment came in to Larry's on Thursday, I tried one out of the box, and it was both "gritty" and "grabby." Not pleasant at all. When I went back on Saturday, both the range gun and the one I bought were a bit less so. I think you notice it less when shooting than when dry firing. The triggers are not the gun's greatest asset, particularly for one accustomed to a 1911. But I think it would make a nice SSP gun. And likely a nice carry gun. Whether it is better that a Glock is probably a toss-up.

I will probably have the gun with me next IDPA match, and you can see it for yourself.


Longeyes,

I am saying virtually every round (from first until last) requires the included mag loader. I tried manually loading the rounds without the loader and (struggling) was able to get in 4 or 5 or 6 with great difficulty. It is not impossible to get a few rounds in the magazine by hand, but virtually so. Use of the loader is a practical necessity.



While cleaning the gun this weekend, I noted the apparent frailty of the disassembly pin. The pin itself is attached to a paper-thin flat piece of stamped metal, and I can see myself bending it at some point down the road. I hope they are inexpensive, because I will be buying replacements, I guarantee!

Also, this morning, I tried the SR-9 in a Glock 19 Fobus Holster, and it did not fit. The holster was too tight. So, I will try a Glock 17 Holster some time today and let you know if that fits.

Boarhunter
 

Boarhunter

New member
Longeyes,

My IT guy just made a liar out of me.... Though not particularly easy, he did load 11 rounds into one of my magazines without the use of the Ruger loader.

So, perhaps the problem is not as significant as I first thought or perhaps the mag spring is simply loosening up a bit.

Boarhunter
 

Boarhunter

New member
Glock 17 holsters do not fit, nor do any other locally available Glock holsters. Nor have I been able to find today any other holster, other than the "cloth and sponge pouches," that would fit the SR-9.... I will keep looking and invite input from others having more success.

Boarhunter
 

Boarhunter

New member
Sorry, guys, to keep replying to my own post, but information keeps dribbling in....

I just got off the telephone with Ruger. They don't have holsters yet or information on holsters from others. Apparently, things have been moving very, very quickly there over the new SR-9.

They do have extra magazines available. I was going to order 4 extra mags until I heard the price (and then I ordered only two...for a total cost of $87.50!). They must be very good magazines!

Boarhunter
 

denfoote

New member
Apparently my last thread "Who wants a Ruger" got censored, so I'll just ask here. Is ruger still shipping all their guns with ten round magazines?

Ruger's policy has been to ship pistols with standard capacity mags, unless the Jurisdiction prohibits them. For example, you cannot order the SR9 with 17 round mags in California or Hawaii. They are shipped with 10 round mags.
 

Joe D

New member
Boar, you keep comparing the Ruger to a 1911. That is kind of useless info. How does it compare to a Glock 17?
 

2ndamd

New member
I find your posts on the SR9 very informative.
Keep giving us info.
I thought the Glock 17 holster were suppose to work???

Magazines being tight: Try to fully load them and keep them fully loaded for about a week 24/7. I heard other makers having a break-in period with their magazines too......Beretta Px4 comes to mind.

ps the Beretta Px4 is an awesomely great gun with tight mags at first.
 

Boarhunter

New member
2ndamd,

I thought so too, but they do not. At least the plastic Glock 17 holsters do not. I pulled an old worn and stretched Galco IWB holster, originally intended for a snubby 1911, out of my bag and found the SR-9 fits it adequately until something better comes along. A new custom fitted IWB holster for a Colt Commander almost, but did not quite, fit.

Joe D,

Sorry, but my comparisons come from my own personal experience. I am a 1911 guy, but I was looking for a carry gun in 9mm that was similar in feel and operation to the 1911, but carried more than the 9 rounds typically found in the 9mm single stack. And I am hopeful this is the one.

I do not own a Glock 17 nor have I ever fired a 17 (but I do own a 19, 26, and 30) so direct comparison is impossible for me. I do believe the grip "feels" better than the Glock 19..."thinner" in my hand and more comfortable...but that is purely subjective. I have not taken the time (since Saturday when I got the gun) to measure actual specs of the grips. "How it feels to me" is good enough for me....

Boarhunter
 

Bart Noir

New member
that included reading the disassembly instructions in the manual

'hunter, 'hunter, 'hunter. Manhood endangerment!

Why buy a whole new pistolla and then cheat yourself out the fun of taking it apart without instructions? Sheesh, you probably send in all those warrenty registration cards from new products too. ;)

Bart Noir
Who will need instructions to put them back together.
 

Boarhunter

New member
Bart Noir,

I guess I exposed my "sensitive" side to the world, didn't I....?

Perhaps there is a program I can attend to break me from reading instruction manuals in the future? Or a patch I can wear?

Maybe we can "group hug" or something?

Boarhunter
 

JohnKSa

Administrator
Perhaps there is a program I can attend to break me from reading instruction manuals in the future?
Learn to accept it. :D

<stands up>
<clears throat>

Umm...
<looks around nervously>
Hello, my name is JohnKSa and I always read the owner's manual before I use or disassemble a newly purchased firearm.
<sits down abruptly>
 

Boarhunter

New member
I now have 200 rounds through the gun and can add a few additional comments regarding the new Ruger SR-9.

First, the magazines are loosening up just a bit...I can now get 7 rounds in the 17-round magazine before resorting to the mag loader! Making progress.

Second, out of the box, the gun was shooting approximately 1 inch low at 10 yards (and a hair to the left). I left the windage "as is," but easily corrected the elevation point of impact with a screwdriver and 4 or 5 rounds downrange. The rear adjustable sight worked just fine.

Third, at some point in my shooting (at about the 150th round downrange), the slide occasionally failed to lock back on an empty magazine. I am not going to get too concerned about the issue unless it continues. I have been shooting the mags as they came, without any cleaning or lubrication, and that may be part of the problem.

Fourth, the mag release button got stiff and difficult to use between range sessions. It loosened up during the last session, so I plan to keep an eye on that as well.

As for the shooting, I remain very satisfied with the gun's accuracy and performance.

For your information.

Boarhunter
 

Boarhunter

New member
Update:

Approaching 400 rounds through the SR-9, and I am becoming happier with the gun with each additional round.

I can now get 17 rounds into the mags without the use of the included mag loader. I attribute the improvement to two things...relaxing springs and an appreciation and understanding of a "quirk" in the mags.

There is a hole or two in the front of the magazine, and long ball bullets will snag on the hole as it is being charged, if you do not keep the cartridges settled back in the mag and if you do not load each round by pressing down on the nose of the last loaded cartridge before adding the next. Follow those procedures (or use hollow point ammo...the SR-9 feeds those perfectly, by the way) in a mag that has been fully charged a week or so, and you should have no problems.

The mag release has smoothed up and is no a problem

I still would prefer the safety be built up and reshaped to resemble the 1911 safety so you can rest your thumb on it while shooting.

For your information.

Boarhunter
 
Top