There was a long, & acrimonius discussion on the topic on yet another board. Once you got past the usual infighting & handbag flinging there was some evidence to support the original idea that there was an issue with tolerances.
At least enought to prompt me to check a couple of different brands of case I had lying around.
The main point of the discussion drifted into a Winchester ammo bashing thread. But stripped of all the ranting heres the basics.
"spec" for the .303 is 0.455 just in front of the rim.
Several cases from several brands, some US made, some not, measured 0.452, but the Prvi measured 0.454. Not a lot, but enough to allow a little "extra" expansion directly in front of the web.
Sectioning a few cases showed more brass thickness with Prvi as well. They also had less noticable thinning of the brass internally when I did the paperclip test.
This got me thinking, so I picked a few cases that I'd fired & checked diameters at a few points along the length of the case, starting directly in front of the rim, & going past the annular ring created when firing.
The "other brand" expanded to 0.455, right at the ring, but were 0.450 behind it. The Prvi started out with a bigger diameter & so had less pronounced ringing, but the diameter at the "ring" was the same as the "other brand".
This, together with the reputation for "generous" chamber dimensions, & misunderstanding of rimmed headspace on Enfields makes me wonder if the reputation has overtaken the real issue slightly.
I've fired in both a Savage made #4Mk1* (which absolutely has generous chamber dimensions) and a '55 Faz #4MkII which is much tighter, to the point that case fired in the Savage are hard to chamber in the other rifle. In both cases there was the ringing, but ONLY with the "other brand". This isn't a scientific test, I know, but the results are interesting as they indicate that chamber dimensions aren't the only part to the puzzle.
Both rifles are headspaced correctly, and I do use a F/L sizing die, but I tailor the amount of die adjustment to the chamber, setting it up so that the fireformed shoulder does have contact with the chamber walls. This plus the ringing on some brands only leads me to suspect that what is actually being seen in some cases is not a "correct" case expanding to fit a sloppy chamber, but an undersized case expanding to fit a correctly sized chamber.
Visually the effects will look very similar, but measurements will tell which possibility is the correct one.
Just to confuse the issue in some cases both things may be happening at the same time, undersized brass expanding to fit an oversized chamber.