Skans said:Accuracy really isn't an issue for me. This would be for my daughter - she wants something to shoot in .22lr. I have looked at the plastic receiver S&W AR-22's and I figure for what I'd have to spend for one of those, I could build a better one. Still, those only run about $400-$450.
riffraff said:I dont care if its 2 moa or 3 moa or 1 moa.. off my shoulder with a red dot i can hit clay pigeons at 80 yards - "good enough"...
That might be the case but also you can flex even an aluminum upper maybe if you try, and if you dont flex the polymer upper it probably doesn't matter. There is at least one torture test I saw a video of and my recollection was it made little difference when intentionally attempting to flex the rifle.I don't mean to denigrate the 15-22, and "good enough" is a sound measure for choosing a product.
The 15-22 has a single flaw that can't be resolved -- the polymer upper. It means that the barrel is affixed to something flexible so its relation ship to a scope is always flexible. Since S&W made the dimensions slightly different, one can't just pop on a "real" AR aluminium upper receiver.
I'm sort of a polymer enthusiast, but the upper receiver doesn't seem the right place for it.
9x19 said:I like the 15-22 magazines...
http://www.maglula.com/product/ruger-10-22-lula-loader/15-22 magazines are one reason to prefer the AR as a 22lr platform over the 10/22. The 10/22 rotary magazine gets 10 out of 10 for durability, but loading it is tough on the finger tips.
riffraff said:I've had a little interest in buying a 2nd 15-22, basically since I own 9000 magazines already ...