How did you obtain a personal protection permit? My understanding is that those are only issued if the is a "verifiable specific risk" to the life of an individual.manta49 said:Its down to individual choice, i could carry a firearm but choose not to.
Originally Posted by manta49
Its down to individual choice, i could carry a firearm but choose not to.
How did you obtain a personal protection permit? My understanding is that those are only issued if the is a "verifiable specific risk" to the life of an individual.
PSNI. Summary
(a) For the purposes of this Policy an applicant for a PPW will be deemed to have ‘good
reason’ if it is established that:
(b) There is a specific threat against the individual which creates a real and immediate risk
verified by a specialist police report; or
(c) In exceptional circumstances, a verifiable level of risk is established by other
information and
(d) The possession of a firearm is a reasonable, proportionate and necessary measure to
protect the life of the applicant.
(e) In addition to satisfying good reason primacy exists in the decision-making process to
the requirements of Article 5(2) (a) of the Order in that the applicant must be
considered a fit person to be entrusted with a firearm.
You didn't answer the question: How do you qualify to carry a firearm if you should choose to do so?manta49 said:Correct, or x or serving police officers, prison officers, army, and a individuals job that could put them at risk. That could be cleaner etc or anyone that supplies or works for the security forces.How did you obtain a personal protection permit? My understanding is that those are only issued if the is a "verifiable specific risk" to the life of an individual.
PSNI. Summary
(a) For the purposes of this Policy an applicant for a PPW will be deemed to have ‘good
reason’ if it is established that:
(b) There is a specific threat against the individual which creates a real and immediate risk
verified by a specialist police report; or
(c) In exceptional circumstances, a verifiable level of risk is established by other
information and
(d) The possession of a firearm is a reasonable, proportionate and necessary measure to
protect the life of the applicant.
(e) In addition to satisfying good reason primacy exists in the decision-making process to
the requirements of Article 5(2) (a) of the Order in that the applicant must be
considered a fit person to be entrusted with a firearm.
You didn't answer the question: How do you qualify to carry a firearm if you should choose to do so?
If I need a gun there how about staying away.
Another pitch for better training..not only for initial ownership but also for CCW...A lot of those who own guns and lots who 'might' carry really have no idea what they are doing..If I need a gun there how about staying away. How many permit holds have not shot a handgun since the qualifications? To me, those people are more of a threat than some shooter. It's gotten worse as of late with open carry. Anybody with a full size Glock in an Uncles Mike's holster does not come across very well with me.
Interesting. You've met that many members in person? Is there a get together I'm missing?In my experience and observations, those who do, seldom engage in lengthy discussions as this thread, they simply do it. And those who engage in such long winded debates, well, they seldom really do carry.
It's a rare event. That's why, if we want to claim we can make a difference in rare events, it is critical that people who can carry, do carry all the time and that they have taken responsibility for developing a reasonable skill level.I have not seen anybody shot in nearly fifty years.
My suggestion would be that permit holders take responsibility for developing a reasonable skill level.How many permit holders have any target identification training or can keep five shots out of ten in the 9 ring in a B27 target at five yards?
It is possible that potential mass shootings, stopped early by the use or display of lethal force, are simply never acknowledged as mass shootings.