So, here's a question that occurred to me because I heard two different things. If there are any LEO's to read this, it would be particularly great to your input, but if anyone else has perspective or experience to offer, that's good too.
I live in a state that does NOT by law require a holder of a CHL to inform a law enforcement officer if they are carrying when a traffic stop is made. Months ago, when I was taking the required CHL course, the instructor said that though not required, it was considered polite and courteous to inform the officer if you are carrying, this shows the officer that you're concerned that they be informed, and as a result could even potentially make the officer more lenient towards you.
Yesterday, I happened to be browsing the the FAQ section of the Oregon Firearms Federation website, this is a pro-gun lobby in my state. They state that since one is not required to inform a police officer (so at least both sources have the fact of the matter straight), they actually should not mention their CHL or that they are carrying unless asked, because the officer will likely take it as a threat and could thus become hostile.
So the question that goes out is, if you are to speak from experience, or even logic, if not legally to inform a LEO that you happen to be carrying during a traffic stop, is it best to inform the officer anyways, or best not to because the issue at hand is how fast you were going, and not your firearm?
I live in a state that does NOT by law require a holder of a CHL to inform a law enforcement officer if they are carrying when a traffic stop is made. Months ago, when I was taking the required CHL course, the instructor said that though not required, it was considered polite and courteous to inform the officer if you are carrying, this shows the officer that you're concerned that they be informed, and as a result could even potentially make the officer more lenient towards you.
Yesterday, I happened to be browsing the the FAQ section of the Oregon Firearms Federation website, this is a pro-gun lobby in my state. They state that since one is not required to inform a police officer (so at least both sources have the fact of the matter straight), they actually should not mention their CHL or that they are carrying unless asked, because the officer will likely take it as a threat and could thus become hostile.
So the question that goes out is, if you are to speak from experience, or even logic, if not legally to inform a LEO that you happen to be carrying during a traffic stop, is it best to inform the officer anyways, or best not to because the issue at hand is how fast you were going, and not your firearm?