Correia, thanks for taking the time to explain your position to me.
You make the points I would have expected so I feel a little more assured about Cond 2.
I would like to address the points you've raised. Not to debate them, but simply to "give my side of the story".
1. I don't even think about racking the slide ... I, as well, have dry fired quite a bit by pulling the hammer back with my thumb ... it's never slipped and, I can't figure out how to pull the hammer back and keep the grip safety pushed in (all with one hand, which is the way I cock it) at the same time ... also, if the hammer did slip, the gun cannot possibly fire unless the grip safety is pushed in AND the trigger is pulled ... at least on all my 1911's ... if that were not the case, then I would be against it as well ... NO BOOM.
2. Any force against the hammer (while down) will not fire the gun unless the trigger is pulled (which cannot be accomplished unless the grip safety is pushed in) ... at least in my 1911's (actually, I think this is one of the first safeties in the 1911's ancestors that JMB put in ... but, I could be wrong). Most 1911's (if not all) have a safety which immobilizes the firing pin and can only be disengaged by pulling the trigger.
3. I never suggested that cocking a 1911 is faster than disengaging the thumb safety ... however, for those of us who do dry fire (quite a bit), we can still be pretty quick ... at least I can ... that's a compromise I'm willing to make.
4. I probably shouldn't have insinuated (sp?) anything about what JMB may or may not have intended. But, it bugs me when people talk about "the way is was designed to be" when they don't have the first clue what JMB was thinking. One other point though, you ever notice how all the Glock lovers bring up that "no safety means less chance of screwing up worrying about all those fancy levers"? As though, not having a safety were better for combat situations? After all, JMB was trying to get a military contract. Just more fuel for the fire I suppose.
5. I actually considered this ... which means, I wouldn't be too surprised if it were true. However, I still find it very hard to believe that nearly all manufacturers are putting on elongated hammers with a ribbed top (which obviously are only meant to be gripped better) for the sole purpose of allowing quicker/simpler dry-firing. Even if I called Colt and Kimber and they said that, I wouldn't believe 'em ... it's just a little too much. Interesting though, I've never heard this come up in the Glock vs. 1911 threads (ie. 1911 is better 'cause it allows for quicker/simpler dry-firing).
6. I've never even considered that ... it's never been an issue for me ... of course, I've got pretty big hands ... maybe it is an issue for other people.
7. I agree that "decocking a 1911 CAN be dangerous" ... certainly if attempted with only one hand. However, I have absolutely no worries with my method. Still, it's not something I'd teach someone else only because I can't know how much respect they have for the gun and how careful they'd be. If it were somebody who's owned and handled a 1911 for a few years, then I wouldn't be so hesitant. In the end, it's no more dangerous than remembering NOT to point a loaded gun at yourself and pull the trigger. Guns are dangerous ... as so many like to point out ... use what's between your ears.
8. I know it is very difficult for the 1911 thumb safety to be "bumped" off ... especially in a belly band. And, if it weren't for my ambi-safety, I might just carry Cond 1. But, for now, it's something I don't care to worry about. Remember, just because it's never happened to you, doesn't mean it'll never happen. If that sort of thinking were appropriate, only about .01% of us would be talking about this stuff. And, if it does get "bumped" off, you're not carrying a Glock ... most carry Glocks have a 5.5 lbs trigger with a longer trigger pull and a trigger safety (which actually does work quite well). If 1911's had a trigger safety (ala Glock), I probably wouldn't own one ('cause then it's not a 1911), but, I'd feel a lot safer about Cond 1 turning into Cond 0.
9. Re-holster Cond 1 if time or place is not appropriate for Cond 2 and change to Cond 2 when time permits. AND, while carrying Cond 1, I'd just be extra careful if I bump something or somebody bumps me.
How 'bout that ... between us, we have $0.04.