How do we know if we're winning, is the question?
Well, I think the answer is pretty clearly is nationwide drug USE rates over time by people, INCLUDING the substitue alcohol, which is equally devastating. I don't know the answer, but I believe that we're losing it (quite predictably). Any other measure (drug bust numbers, etc. are only a rough and possibly misleading measure, if the GOAL is to reduce drug USE and ABUSE by Americans, which it is). But before I talk out of my nether regions, whose got some credible stats on nationwide drug use/abuse rates, including alcohol?
And even if we are "winning" by this measure, that's still not the whole story. Everything's a tradeoff, so we have to look at what COST have we incurred to "win"? Cost in terms not only of money/taxes, but more importantly in lost civil rights (1A, 2A, 4A, 5A, 10A, etc)? I submit that, at least under the way this "war" has been run so far, the benefits, even if we are winning, do not come anywhere CLOSE to the cost of lost civil rights, not to mention the injustices of federal 3-strikers who are serving 25-life for just being junkies or the neighborhood pot man, or the high cost of prison facilities to incarcerate all the junkies.
If we really wanted to win (as opposed to just justify LEOA budgets and give the sheeple something to spur them to the polls to continue to aggrandize Repukelican political power), then it would be quite simple. Take all of the alphabet soup federal LEOAs involved in said "war", excise the anti-drug divisions from all of them, then combine all into ONE anti-drug agency. Then, take the combined budgets of said divisions, and SLASH IT by about 2/3rds, leaving them 1/3 of what they used to have to conduct this "war". Then, give about 1/2 of the saved money back to the people in the form of a tax cut, and spend the other half on treatment facilities and educating our young people of the dangers of drugs and voila, you'll have less people overall doing drugs, far more civil rights, and more money in your pocket. It's been proven that interdiction money is nearly a complete waste, with virtuall no impact on drug availability or drug use (that's flying in and doing raids in Columbia etc.). There is a significantly better return on border prevention LEOA money spent, but still relatively quite poor. Whereas drug treatment facility dollars have been shown to have a far far higher return on investment than ANY type of measure involving drug crime enforcemnt. Dollar for dollar, it reduces drug use more than anything an LEOA is capable of doing. That IS the goal, isn't it? To reduce drug USE?