I don't have time right now for the long version of this,
My opinions about unions are irrelevant.Any individual,union,non union,etc,can have a good or poor attitude about the Quality they produce.
I'll agree that conflict and power struggles between labor and management can take priority over delivering a Quality product to a customer.
But,IMO,thats a red herring distraction from the main issue.
Many of us Gun Folks still dwell in a paradigm of the past. The Guild system...from Apprentice to the Master,and Old Joe,the 30 year toolroom Master.
Manufacturing has changed. Old Joe is an anachronism.Unless you have actively worked in manufacturing this side of the 1990;s,it may be hard to understand.
If you want a contract,or even a market to sell your handgun(or other product) they do not want to rely on Old Joe. Joe can die,or get an attitude
Every design,part,material,process,training,inspection…..every detail is documented and must be complied with.
Many parts are farmed out.Suppliers are "Qualified" to "Only ship good parts" .
Tracible lots of parts are received,and ideally,used without the "non value added" process of inspection".
And its absolutely unacceptable for an "Old Joe" to touch a file or a stone to a part.
Line employees are trained how to assemble a product from a "kit" of parts picked in the stockroom per work order.
That line employee is hired per Federal and State laws and regulations such as EEOC.
It may not be lawful to insist that,in the USA,the employee be fluent in the English language.I'm not disparaging or disrespecting anyone. The etymology of the word "babble" goes back to an Old Story about a "Tower of Babel" Manufacturers are limited as far as how selectively they hire.
This Human Assembly Unit is trained per Documented Training policy,and monitored via Statistical Process Control.
Your firearm may never get test fired.
Your pre-war Winchester likely has Proof Marks.I doubt your Bushmaster does.
Define "Quality" Its not so easy. I heard it said once ,maybe from Juran,that a definitive measure of Quality is how the customer feels after spending the buck.
Imo,by many measures,we get more Quality for our buck now than we ever did before...especially if we could deduct costs the mfgr cannot control,from compliance to Health insurance,etc. We pay.
The beauty is,we have choices...from a $375 Philippine 1911,to an "Old Joe" built $3000 Les Baer or Wilson,etc. Or,a S+W or Glock modern expression of a handgun that ,in many ways,may not please our aesthetics...but it MIGHT be lighter,hold twice the ammo,be very reliable,and prices start competitive with the bargain rate 1911's.
And,odds are good,given modern computer design resources the modern gun is designed around modern methods and it will run out of the box.