What surprised me about this story was that there are legal gun owners living in San Francisco. The political and economic climate of California is so bad, and the anti-gun culture so strong that I wonder how gun owners tolerate living in that state. And within California it seems San Francisco is exponentially worse.
I visited SF a few years ago, and while the area is nice, the experience of being in this city was terrible. Never have I seen so many homeless people milling about, blocking store doorways, taking up every bench in every park, etc. The smell of urine permeated much of the downtown and waterfront areas. Adding that to the high cost and oppressive regulatory environment, I have no idea why normal people, including gun owners would want to live there. I guess if you belong to a sub-community that doesn't feel welcome in most places, but is welcomed in SF, then it might be a reasonable place to choose for one's residence.
I visited SF a few years ago, and while the area is nice, the experience of being in this city was terrible. Never have I seen so many homeless people milling about, blocking store doorways, taking up every bench in every park, etc. The smell of urine permeated much of the downtown and waterfront areas. Adding that to the high cost and oppressive regulatory environment, I have no idea why normal people, including gun owners would want to live there. I guess if you belong to a sub-community that doesn't feel welcome in most places, but is welcomed in SF, then it might be a reasonable place to choose for one's residence.