The background check for each ammo purchase seems ridiculous and expensive for the purchase of small amounts of ammo. I'm sure this will simply result in bulk purchases by those who shoot even moderate amounts or prompt shooters to buy in-person, out-of-state. The smarter ones would purchase from a store a little deeper into a neighboring state and would toss boxes or other material which lists the lot number so as to avoid easy tracing.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CA Update: AB962 = CA Appellate Court Upholds Injunction 11/06/13
- Thread starter .300 Weatherby Mag
- Start date
To keep everyone up to date on this case, December 16th, the CA-DOJ filed a petition for review with the CA Supreme Court: http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Parker-v.-Calfiornia_Petition-for-Review.pdf
Then on January 10th, the Respondents filed their answer in opposition to review: http://michellawyers.com/wp-content..._Conformed-Answer-to-Petition-for-Review-.pdf
On January 21, the State filed its reply: http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...a_Reply-In-Support-of-Petition-for-Review.pdf
We now wait for a grant or denial of review.
Then on January 10th, the Respondents filed their answer in opposition to review: http://michellawyers.com/wp-content..._Conformed-Answer-to-Petition-for-Review-.pdf
On January 21, the State filed its reply: http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...a_Reply-In-Support-of-Petition-for-Review.pdf
We now wait for a grant or denial of review.
Sean Michel n Assoc
New member
This is an NRA Supported Lawsuit
Colt46, to be clear, Calguns has nothing to do with this case. Our firm represents the CRPA Foundation in this lawsuit and the NRA is supporting the case.
Colt46, to be clear, Calguns has nothing to do with this case. Our firm represents the CRPA Foundation in this lawsuit and the NRA is supporting the case.