ATF says medical marijuana users can't buy guns of any kind

Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

youngunz4life

New member
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/09/3...o-medical-marijuana-patients/?intcmp=trending

I was wondering about the legal aspects of this, and if it is in fact legal to deny someone with a lawful prescription of cannabis to purchase a weapon for self-defense? Prescription drugs are extremely dangerous and much moreso than people realize(can take yrs and yrs off your life if abused), yet it would be upsurd for gun dealers to receive instructions stating firearms can't be purchased by individuals with legal prescriptions of narcotics from pharmacies. This sounds like a quick fix or lazy approach to avoid updating their forms. Does anybody agree with this new strategy?
 
T

Tom Servo

Staff
It's not really new. On the federal level, marijuana is still illegal, despite the fact that some states allow its prescription. Therefore, even with a prescription that's legal under state law, a purchaser must answer "yes" on question 12 (e) on the 4473, and is therefore ineligible to buy a firearm from a licensed dealer:

Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana, or any depressant, stimulant, or narcotic drug, or any other controlled
substance?
Click to expand...

The conflict between federal and state law on the matter is ripe for a lawsuit, but there hasn't been much headway on this yet.
 
Z

zukiphile

New member
The conflict between federal and state law on the matter is ripe for a lawsuit, but there hasn't been much headway on this yet.
Click to expand...

There is the Sup. Ct. decision in Raich. I don't find the majority decision compelling, but it does hold in favor of a federal power to make illicit use that in not interstate or commercial.

As a social matter, I oppose MJ use, but as a legal matter I think an individual could plausibly argue in good faith by extension of existing law that his non-commercial use within his own state would allow him to answer "no" to that question.

The problem I see with getting a prescription is that I envision that rx being filled by someone for money. That's commerce.
 
U

Uncle Buck

New member
I have met several people who claim to have medical marijuana cards and therefore been legal users. I would not want to shoot with any of them.

My first wife was advised by her doctor (back in 1985) to smoke it to help with the chemo. I had to sit outside while she smoked. It did help her and she actually gained about 20 pounds.

(I was stationed in Korea at the time and pot was available through the Korean pharmacies.)

But I see so much of this being abused. Bottom line, it is still a federal offense and you would be lying on the form.
 
C

carprivershooter

New member
Gun ownership and marijuana

I am a addiction counselor. As you might guess I deal with medical marijuana and recovery. If you use medical marijuana you are not in recovery. You are looking for a legal way to continue to get high. As stated in other posts marijuana use is still a violation of federal law. But what we need to keep in mind is what do our state laws said about being under the influence of marijuana and in possession of a fire arm. In Michigan if you are caught under the influence of alcohol you can lose your CPL (concealed pistol license). If you are caught under the influence or possession of any control substance and a firearm you just added time to your sentence. Driving under the influence of a control substance you are charged with impaired driving prescribed or not. This issuse is more than just a can of worms, it's a bucket of worms. I do not want to shoot with anyone that is high, weed, booze, prescribed pain meds.
 
V

vranasaurus

New member
My problem with medical marijuana is that it is smoked. I think we have the technology to refine the actual chemicals in marijuana that would be medically useful. The fact that people with marijuana prescriptions go and pick out what kind of marijuana they want renders it not a prescription.

A prescription should specify the actual medicine and dose. Marijuana prescriptions don't do that and are really problematic.

Marijuana prescriptions appear to be a way for people to get high when they want to.
 
C

carprivershooter

New member
Medical weed

Some of the doctors I have talked to about this issue recommend their patients brew the marijuana into a tea, or vaporize it and breath the mist. Still getting high but not killing your lungs.




I don't have answers, just lots of questions.
 
G

Glenn E. Meyer

New member
The actual usage of marijuana is not our issue, nor is the how to use it.

A conflict between state and local laws would be relevant. The issue of legalization of marijuana for medical purposes and how that interacts with gun rights would be.

However, a general discussion of marijuana usage is not. This is a narrow line to walk.
 
S

silentargus

New member
Is anybody really surprised by this? Not only is weed still illegal at a national level, but the ATF has always jumped on every chance it could get to further restrict access to guns. 2 + 2 = foregone conclusion. :rolleyes:
 
C

Chaz88

New member
Historically this might be more of an issue than some think, as related to the second amendment. Up to about the early 1900’s it was considered unconstitutional for the federal government to tell you what you could and could not put in your body. Also any such regulation was considered a state matter and the Feds were not supposed to be able to infringe on the state’s ability to decide such matters. Then some clever legal types figured out ways to start infringing on individual and state rights without technically violating the constitution. Sound familiar?
 
F

Frank Ettin

Administrator
youngunz4life said:
I was wondering about the legal aspects of this, and if it is in fact legal to deny someone with a lawful prescription of cannabis ...
Click to expand...
There is no such thing as a lawful prescription for marijuana. Under the Controlled Substances Act, it is a Schedule I drug and may not, under federal law, be lawfully prescribed.

So anyone using marijuana, even under a state medical marijuana program, is an unlawful user of a controlled substance for the purposes of 18 USC 922(g).
 
Last edited:
M

Mr. James

New member
The Supremes settled this, rightly or wrongly, in Gonzales v. Raich in 2005. State laws to the contrary notwithstanding, possession, sale and use of marijuana is illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act. The nine robed poltroons used the Commerce Clause, one of the defendant's profferred challenges, to reach even home-grown marijuana cultivated exclusively for personal use (see the earlier, even more hideous abortion of justice titled Wickard v. Filburn).

Sorry, but under existing law, there is no way you can use marijuana and truthfully answer "no" to 4473 question 12(e).

The ATF is a malignancy ripe for extraction. I micturate upon it from a great height. Maybe someone can write Eric Holder a prescription for medical marijuana to ameliorate the necessary surgery and chemo for excising this tumor.
 
Last edited:
C

Chaz88

New member
Federal -vs- State... The ATF trumps...
Click to expand...

Yes, in practice they do. But with strict adherence to the constitution many times the feds not only should not trump the state but are in fact violating, or at best circumventing, the constitution.
 
F

Frank Ettin

Administrator
Chaz88 said:
Federal -vs- State... The ATF trumps...
Click to expand...
Yes, in practice they do. But with strict adherence to the constitution many times the feds not only should not trump the state but are in fact violating, or at best circumventing, the constitution.
Click to expand...
Perhaps in your alternate universe.

Many of us live in the real world where what really counts in what happens in practice. The opinions of courts regarding, and the ways the courts apply, the laws and the Constitution affect the lives and property of real people in the real world. Your opinions on such matters do not.
 
C

Chaz88

New member
Perhaps in your alternate universe.

Many of us live in the real world where what really counts in what happens in practice. The opinions of courts regarding, and the ways the courts apply, the laws and the Constitution affect the lives and property of real people in the real world. Your opinions on such matters do not.
Click to expand...

So in your universe when the opinions of the courts compleatly trump the second amendment to the constitution that will be OK because that is what will be happening in practice in the real world?

Is it OK that much of what the fourth amendment originally encompassed has been slowly eroded but most do not even know it because it started many years ago and slowly became the norm for what now happens, in practice, in the real world?
 
C

Chaz88

New member
I wonder, does it make any difference if the people get their pot directly from the federal government? Not like this would be the only example of the feds violating their own laws or anything.
Click to expand...

I think there is maybe one person alive today that got into that program.
 
D

Don P

New member
Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana, or any depressant, stimulant, or narcotic drug, or any other controlled
substance?
Click to expand...

And if you have a script for the weed then the answer to the above quote is NO. IMO anyone that answers yes to the above question and has the script is stupid and should not own a gun anyway. Now who's boging the splif!:eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top