Anybody Use #9 or Scott 4100 in 38 Super?

rc

New member
I want to use up some plated 38 bullets in my super. I was looking at data and I see #9 actually has some data listed. I understand 4100 can be loaded with #9 data. So has anybody tried either #9 or 4100 in their super?
 

Shadow9mm

New member
Only loads I have ever heard you could substitute data with were the same powders under different brand names. Like hp-38 and w231. Heard of this with a couple powders but never heard of this with #9 and 4100. You should never substitute load data.

I tried #7 in 9mm. Worked well with 124s. was too slow for 115s. No velocity increase in the last 1grain up to max if I remember correctly. Not sure how much slower #9 is.

If there's listed loads I'd give it a try.
 

rc

New member
4100 is a 410 shotgun powder like H110 and I've ready you can use #9 data because it's a tad slower. I've tried it in 32 mag and it's a good magnum class powder. Just wanting to see if anyone has loaded powder as slow as #9 in 38 super. Speer #13 has a load for #9 with 147 grain bullets and Lyman 48 has a load with 158 grain bullets and #9.
 

mehavey

New member
4100 waaaaay too slow.
Full case under 115gr w/ 5" barrel leaves 40% unburned
Full case under 147gr w/ 5" barrel leaves 35% unburned

#9 in same condition also too slow and over pressures (weird)
98% case under 147gr w/ 5" barrel leaves 30% unburned/MAX's Pressure

Best for combined effect (in order):
Shooters World Major Pistol
Accurate No.7
Alliant POWER PISTOL
Vihtavuori 3N38
Vihtavuori 3N37
 
Last edited:

rc

New member
OK, sounds like you've tried the combination enough to know. I don't have those powders you listed but I do have other more suitable powders. I will save the 4100 for where it's more applicable.
 

74A95

New member
#9 looks like good powder for the 38 Super. Speer and Hornady both have data for it.

I've used #9 with some 'experimental' loads in the Super and 9X23 Comp. I liked it.

I've not used Scott 4100. Is that the same as Accurate 4100?
 
Last edited:

74A95

New member
OK, sounds like you've tried the combination enough to know. I don't have those powders you listed but I do have other more suitable powders. I will save the 4100 for where it's more applicable.

I think Mehavey is just quoting Quickload output. That's not actually using the powders.
 

74A95

New member
4100 is a 410 shotgun powder like H110 and I've ready you can use #9 data because it's a tad slower. I've tried it in 32 mag and it's a good magnum class powder. Just wanting to see if anyone has loaded powder as slow as #9 in 38 super. Speer #13 has a load for #9 with 147 grain bullets and Lyman 48 has a load with 158 grain bullets and #9.

Hodgdon says H110 is a pistol powder. It says so on the label.
https://shop.hodgdon.com/hodgdon/hodgdon-h110

Accurate 4100, if that is the same as Scott 4100, is also a pistol powder.
https://shop.hodgdon.com/accurate/accurate-4100r

Accurate powders for 38 Super:
https://www.shootingtimes.com/editorial/super-accurate-38-super-loads/326242

Powders for fast 38 Super:
https://www.shootingtimes.com/editorial/super-powders-for-the-38-super/99160
 

rc

New member
Well, I guess trying it couldn't hurt but was hoping to save myself the trouble if someone else found it to be totally unsuitable. I just thought with 158s in 38 super it might work OK.
 

rc

New member
I made loads with #7 for 9mm and 40 years ago. The dusk fireballs from the 40 were very impressive! I imagine 4100 may give similar results in low light.
 

Shadow9mm

New member
So I was running a 4in barrel a 4.5 or 5in might have made all the difference. Also I was using significantly lower charges, I believe maxing out at 8.6g of #7.

Based on a few things I have learned recemtly, #7 and a few other powders like to be pushed hard, max loads or high pressure.

Had good luck with it with the 124s, but with my 115s in a 4in barrel I had no velocity increases after 8.0g up to 8.6. Think the heavier bullet gave me better burn.
 

Shadow9mm

New member
Shadow9mm, do you shoot and/or have you loaded 38 Super?

Ahh, the passive aggressive comment that will be used to try and make my statements irrelevant.

No, I do not load 38super. But I do and have been loading for a while now, and am or have loaded for the following. 9mm, 38spl, 357mag, 44spl, 44mag, 45acp, 223rem, 308win, 30-06, and 30-06 garand specific.

As I stated, I have used #7 in 9mm with a 4in barrel. I had poor results with 115g and good results with 124s and why I believed that was the case. I stated that #9 was slower.

I never said not to try it. I said the exact opposite. I said, if you have load data for it, give it a try.

I had a similar experience with 44spl and H110 recently. I had data, but was advised it would not work well. They were right, it did not work well, but it did work, and I'm glad I tried it.

Do I think #9 will work, yes I do. Do I think it will perform well based on my experience with slower powders in auto handgun cartridges, probably not. But I think its worth a try.

The only thing I advised against is substituting powders. It's a bad idea with the few exceptions where it's the exact same powder made by a different manufacturer.

P.S. I have no doubt #7 runs well In the 9mm major. However all I can relate is my experience with sammi spec 9mm. In 9mm, within published load data, with 115g fmj, in a 4in barrel, I got no velocity increase from 8.0 to the 8.6g max listed in my manual. When I tried with 124g bullets I got up into the low 1100s with consistent velocity gains the whole way up.
 

Shadow9mm

New member
Shadow9mm, have you ever used A#9?

What do you mean by 'perform well'?

By perform well, I mean it will ignite and burn, however it will most likely not fully burn or burn cleanly, and provide poor velocity.

No, but I have been researching #9 for use in 357mag and 44mag for bit now. Going to buy a pound of that and 2400 to start testing with next time I get to the gun shop, hopefully Saturday.

#9 is considerably slower than #7 but not quite into H110 territory. Its slower than 2400 and N105. Consensus was divided as to whether or not #9 needed, or performed better with magnum primers.

Here is western powders load data. They only have data for 38 super +P, which does not include #9 or 4100, and on page 5 they list suitable powder for 38 super.
https://accuratepowder.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/WesternLoadGuide1-2016_Web.pdf

Suitable for 38 super per western in their lineup.
Ramshot ZIP
#2
Ramshot Silhouette
Ramshot true blue
#5
#7

#9 and 4100 are listed but not marked as suitable for 38 super on westerns chart.

Data I could find for #9 in 38 super, Hopefully this is a help.

Lee 2021
lists no loads for 38 super with #9

Lee 2007, a bit out dated
100g jacketed with #9, Start 12.2, max 13.5
115g jacketed with #9, Start 11.7, max 13.0
115g lead with #9, Start 11.3, max 12.5
124g jacketed with #9, Start 11.3, max 12.5
125g lead with #9, Start 10.8, max 12.0
130g jacketed with #9, start 10.7, max 11.9
130g lead With #9, start 10.4, max 11.5
130g plated With #9, start 9.9, max 11.0
140g lead with #9, start 9.9, max 11.0
145g lead with #9, start 9.5, max 10.5
147g jacketed with #9, start 9.2 max 10.2
150g jacketed with #9, start 8.7, max 9.7
151g plated with #9, start 7.7, max 8.6
158g jacketed with #9, start 8.7, max9.7
160g lead with #9, start 8.6, max 9.5

Speer 2018
115g with #9, start 11.7, max 12.7 compressed
124g with #9, start 11.0, max 12.0 ccompressed
125g with #9, start 11.0, max 12.0 compressed
147g with #9, start 9.5, max 10.5 compressed

Lyman2018
158g lead with #9, Start 8.9, max 9.9 compressed

Hornady 10th edition
147g with #9, Start 7.9, Max 10.7

Hornady 11th edition
147g with #9, Start 7.9g max 10.7g

Sierra
no loads with #9

Western (accurate)
no load data with #9
 
Last edited:

totaldla

New member
4100 is renamed by Ramshot as Enforcer. Enforcer is quite a bit slower than AA9, but faster than H110/296. Enforcer/4100 is a true ball powder and does require a magnum primer (as does AA9). AA9 is identical burn rate to 2400, but 2400 lights nicely with a standard primer. This is all based on my experience with these powders in 44mag - I don't know squat about 38super.
 

74A95

New member
#9 is considerably slower than #7 but not quite into H110 territory. Its slower than 2400 and N105.

It depends on which burn rate chart you look at. Western shows #9 as faster than 2400.

Here is western powders load data. They only have data for 38 super +P, which does not include #9 or 4100, and on page 5 they list suitable powder for 38 super.

What do you mean they ONLY have data for 38 Super +P?


Please define what you mean by 'perform well'.


Speer seems to think #9 is fine in the 38 Super. They have load data with it for 115, 124 and 147 grain bullets. Their data shows #9 producing the highest speed with 147 grain bullets.

Lyman also has #9 data for the 38 Super.

And Hornady shows #9, like Speer, producing the top speed with 147 grain bullets.
 
Top