...another James Bond pistol rant

PeterGunn

New member
It's a tool box...

Bond should have a primary sidearm... one that he carries most often. If that's the PPK/s, so be it. That said, if my primary carry is a PPK/s in .380 and I know I'm going into battle, my .380 will take on a backup role to something more substantive and with a higher capacity. A carbine/or combat shotgun would also make it into the mix.
 

KenL

New member
The whole deal with going back to the PPK in Skyfall is that the movie was supposed to be a 50th anniversary of the start of the franchise. Thus the whole retro feel, with the Aston Martin, the office at the end, and of course Moneypenny.
 

KyJim

New member
I agree with those saying the PPK was the perfect pistol for Bond in Skyfall. Nothing fancy or too "obvious." While there are certainly special effects, it is pretty much a gadget-free movie. This, along with the plot and Craig's acting give the movie a very gritty feel for a Bond movie. I think it may be the best.
 

wgsigs

New member
Why not the PPK? Skyfall was kind of a re-boot of the Bond franchise with the introduction of a new "M", the move back to the old location for MI6 HQ, the introduction of "Q" and Moneypenny so a new story for Bond's Walther PPK.
 
wgsigs said:
Why not the PPK? Skyfall was kind of a re-boot of the Bond franchise with the introduction of a new "M", the move back to the old location for MI6 HQ, the introduction of "Q" and Moneypenny so a new story for Bond's Walther PPK.
??? Huh?

Do you perhaps mean the introduction of a new Q and Moneypenny? Both were there in the early Connery movies, and Bond's flirtation with Moneypenny was in most (if not all) the original books.
 

wgsigs

New member
??? Huh?

Do you perhaps mean the introduction of a new Q and Moneypenny? Both were there in the early Connery movies, and Bond's flirtation with Moneypenny was in most (if not all) the original books.
That is why I called it a kind of re-boot. Craig's Bond never had a Q or a Moneypenny or a PPK, that I recall. It is a kind of a restart, an explanation of how the characters first came together. Everybody is now relatively young (Ralph Fiennes vs Bernard Lee for example) except for Bond (Craig).
 
Last edited:

Mk VII

New member
After reading Casino Royale, British gun writer Geoffrey Boothroyd wrote to Ian Fleming, saying, among other things, that he didn't think much of Bond's gun and making a number of suggestions for changes, principally that Bond should have a .357 revolver. Some of Boothroyd's suggestions were incorporated into Dr No, and the armourer character was named 'Major Boothroyd'.

Boothroyd wrote an article about it all in 1985. His S&W .38/200 was borrowed by Fleming for the painting on the cover of From Russia With Love. The trompe-l'œil artist Richard Chopping said the gun had been the "very devil to paint" but he managed it well and did several other covers. It was recreated here in a photo shoot.

standard.jpg
 

Pilot

New member
Moore played the part like he was told to by the director and producers. I didn't like him nearly as much as Connery, who in my mind is the only true Bond, until Clive Owen gets the part.
 

seeker_two

New member
I had hoped once that Ewan McGregor (Obi-Wan) would have been chosen. He could pull off the suave Bond & the action Bond.

If they ever do another Bond parody like the first CASINO ROYALE or the Moore films, I'd pick Hugh Laurie.....
 

lechiffre

New member
Moore played the part like he was told to by the director and producers

This is true. He played Bond a bit differently in the movies directed by Guy Hamilton ( Live and Let Die, TMwtGG). He also played 007 more "real" in For Your Eyes Only.
 
Top