Wreck-n-Crew
New member
Original Filing by Sheriffs
It seems from reading the complaint that it was their intent to complain about the effects of the law and how it inhibits them to do their job/duty (answering my previous question). The judges ruling
Seems to me that the only option left for the sheriffs is to file individually if they wish to have the state hear a complaint. Also if they file individually, they need to change their original complaint to avoid a similar ruling on an individual level would they not?
The Question remains, if the sheriffs complaint had not been job related and filed as a group would they still have been denied and forced to file as individuals in order to have their suit heard?
Given the likelihood that the most reasonable course of action would have been the original complaint, what real option is left to them?
Again being LE what legal recourse do they have to satisfy their complaint on the vagueness of the new law and it's effect on the ability to due their job fairly and without prejudice if the state in essence shut the door?
When a law is this defunct the only outcome is this kind of calamity.
Actually the complaint spans from 90-104 of the complaint here:http://www.i2i.org/files/file/54-sheriffs-complaint.pdf However I wanted to drop the first two in the complaint as an example of the intent and reasoning for the suit filed by the Colorado Sheriffs.
It seems from reading the complaint that it was their intent to complain about the effects of the law and how it inhibits them to do their job/duty (answering my previous question). The judges ruling
So the Sheriffs rights are deemed different than their individual rights! Though legal for the judge to do so, no justice has been served on the part of the sheriffs in any way by the ruling. A motion to dismiss the sheriffs complaint filed by the Governor Hickenlooper, coincides with the previous stated quote by the judge on the reason for the ruling.
Seems to me that the only option left for the sheriffs is to file individually if they wish to have the state hear a complaint. Also if they file individually, they need to change their original complaint to avoid a similar ruling on an individual level would they not?
The Question remains, if the sheriffs complaint had not been job related and filed as a group would they still have been denied and forced to file as individuals in order to have their suit heard?
Given the likelihood that the most reasonable course of action would have been the original complaint, what real option is left to them?
Again being LE what legal recourse do they have to satisfy their complaint on the vagueness of the new law and it's effect on the ability to due their job fairly and without prejudice if the state in essence shut the door?
When a law is this defunct the only outcome is this kind of calamity.