"I think that people are more likely to complain about a 410 being ineffective because it is small."
Could be. I shot my first .410 in the mid to late '50s, owned my first one around 1960 and still have a Winchester Model 37. The .410 is small, there's no getting around it.
Five 000 buck pellets sounds good if you can keep all five on target. People seem to be a lot tougher targets than deer. And deer don't shoot back. Heck, people used to shoot buck shot at geese and turkeys with fair success and a big bird doesn't weigh all that much even if their feathers and fat act like armor. The problem ends up being the spread of the pattern and the big holes in the pattern. Do 5 pellets even make a true pattern or just some random holes?
Could be. I shot my first .410 in the mid to late '50s, owned my first one around 1960 and still have a Winchester Model 37. The .410 is small, there's no getting around it.
Five 000 buck pellets sounds good if you can keep all five on target. People seem to be a lot tougher targets than deer. And deer don't shoot back. Heck, people used to shoot buck shot at geese and turkeys with fair success and a big bird doesn't weigh all that much even if their feathers and fat act like armor. The problem ends up being the spread of the pattern and the big holes in the pattern. Do 5 pellets even make a true pattern or just some random holes?