Every board I visit, and ever since I've been reading about handguns, the grip width is usually cited as the most important factor for grip comfort. I don't understand this notion. Last Friday I shot a SIG 229 for the first time, and out of all the handguns I've handled, it was the first one that allowed me to reach the mag release, slide release, and decocker without shifting my grip. I have a HK P7M8 which is only 1.14 in. in width according to HK's website and the SIG 229 has a grip width of 1.5 in. I can get really close to hitting the mag release on my P7M8 without shifting my grip. Since there are only 3 dimensions to the grip (width, length, and distance from front strap to backstrap), I came to the conclusion that it must be the distance from the front strap to the backstrap that is allowing me to reach all of the controls. Am I incorrect to presume this? This measurement is not given on any sites, so I don't know how all the guns I've handled compare to the SIG 229, but I'm baffled by the importance placed on the grip width when it comes to grip comfort. I've also handled a Glock 36, Glock 23C/19, HK USP full size and compact, SIG 220. On all of the guns that I listed except for the SIG 220, I could not reach all of the controls without shifting my grip. I'm actually not sure about the SIG 220 because I didn't check to see if I could reach all of the controls without shifting my grip. Because I'm a newbie to shooting, I'm beginning to wonder if I'm holding guns incorrectly.