scrubcedar
New member
While I was commenting on another thread about SA revolvers I was struck by how many of us still would choose them first in a situation that a large magazine capacity and or the ability for a quick reload weren't likely to be needed. Most of the parts of this design were developed in the mid 1800's!
Think about it, we still use internal combustion engines and the basic design started roughly in that era but none of the people who designed those engines would have any idea how to fix a modern engine of any kind that they saw. Hand Sam Colt a Freedom Arms SA and he could operate it immediately.
Is it our familiarity with them? Is it the amazing ergonomics? Something else?
We all see that gun folks have a tendency to absolutely lust after the newest/best thing. Why does this design hold such a strong place in our trust?
Think about it, we still use internal combustion engines and the basic design started roughly in that era but none of the people who designed those engines would have any idea how to fix a modern engine of any kind that they saw. Hand Sam Colt a Freedom Arms SA and he could operate it immediately.
Is it our familiarity with them? Is it the amazing ergonomics? Something else?
We all see that gun folks have a tendency to absolutely lust after the newest/best thing. Why does this design hold such a strong place in our trust?