Which you think is best rifle scope

What do you think is the best rifle scopes

  • Bushnell

    Votes: 3 4.3%
  • Burris

    Votes: 7 10.0%
  • Nikon

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Leupold

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Simmons

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • Tasco

    Votes: 3 4.3%
  • Swarvosky

    Votes: 25 35.7%
  • Kahles

    Votes: 3 4.3%

  • Total voters
    70

wolverine350

New member
I just purchased a new Nikon Buckmaster 3x9x40 scope with niko plex reticle for my stevens 200 25-06, after looking at the Leupolds and Burris, and various Bushnell scopes i settled on the Nikon for the clarity and the appearance of the scope along with the warranty they offer, i have always used the cheaper scopes mostly Bushnell in the 60 to 80.00 range and finally spent 200.00 on a Nikon. was wanting others opinions and experiances with scopes:D
 

Scorch

New member
Best for what? Best for the money? Best for hunting flying monkeys? My bet, for the money, quality, durability and warranty is still Leupold.

I think you will get very little argument that the highest quality optics are the German scopes, but you will have a hard time finding people to cough up that kind of money. Nikon makes some good scopes, but hardly anyone buys their top of the line scopes. Bausch & Lomb, who own Bushnell, know a thing or two about optics, but they have sold cheap scopes for so long that you get a lot of smirks if you say you put a Bushnell on a rifle. Zeiss makes outstanding scopes, but their new cheaper Conquest scopes are only as good as a Leupold.

You did OK, don't worry. Nikon is a good scope, and will likely last you a lifetime.
 

SteelCore

New member
Nikon is certainly not a bad company. You probably did really well for $200.

If you're talking about the very best you can buy...well, I'm not an optics guru, but I've heard that U.S. Optics and Schmidt & Bender are truly exceptional. They cost an arm and a leg, though.

Of the choices you listed, I'll pick Swarvosky.
 

mrawesome22

New member
The best scope is the most expensive.

This is a perfect example of why I hate polls. LOL

Swarovski and Tasco in the same grouping? Oh brother.

What about S&B? Sightron? Zeiss is nowhere to be found. LOL

How about Pentax. Weaver.
 
Last edited:

hoytinak

New member
On my budget.....I'd have to go with the Bushnell or the Nikon, the line depending on the application. I'm sure there is ALOT better scopes out there but those two brands have always worked great from me.
 

piercfh

New member
I cant believe so many people voted Leupold. I wouldn't even consider them in the same league as most European scopes.
 

Jseime

New member
I voted leupold because they are the absolute best glass for the money.

Great optics
Unlimited lifetime warranty no questions asked

If you go with any of the higher end scopes than leupold such as a swarovsky and the like you are not getting a better scope just a more expensive scope.
 

stevelyn

New member
Tasco and Simmons shouldn't be on that particular list.:eek:

That's like putting a Ford Escort on the same list with Porsche, Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Cadillac, and a Rolls Royce.:D
 

jhgreasemonkey

New member
I voted burris because for $200 you can have a very nice scope. I had an accident years ago where my rifle fell off a ledge onto the rocks below. The burris scope was scraped and dented. It still worked perfectly to my surprise. This may be a fluke but I was impressed with this scope. Used it for years untill I sold my rifle it was on.
 

BUSTER51

Moderator
S&B is IMHO the "BEST" , and the United States Marines agree they switched from Leupold to S&B and I wouldn't want to argue with them . however you can't beat Nikon Monarch's for the price and I very much doubt you will have a rifle that requires the S&B.
 

BUSTER51

Moderator
Jseime, you should not give advice as you are truely ignorant of the facts . do you even know where Leupold get's thier glass ? :eek:
 

BUSTER51

Moderator
April 13, 2006
Marines Get New Sniper Scope
For the last 25 years, the United States Marine Corps has equipped its snipers with a fixed-power 10X scope made by Unertl Optical Company. But no more. While roaming the aisles at the SHOT Show in February, I saw the Unertl’s successor, which is the Schmidt & Bender PM II LP, and is a 3X-12X variable with S&B’s Gen II mil-dot reticle.

This scope is so big and so complicated that I could not comprehend the thing if I studied it for a month. It was the winner in a competition in which 25 optics companies submitted entries, and it was the only one to meet the Corps’ specifications.

If you would like to get your hands on one, you can join the Corps, go through boot camp where you must qualify as expert with the M-16, and then get into scout-sniper school, which is tough, and graduate, which is even tougher. The Corps will then give you a M40A3 sniper rifle, all 19 pounds of it, lots of match ammo, and a chance to use it where it will do the most good.

Or you can simply pony up $2,849, which is the MSRP for the civilian version of the Marine scope. It doesn’t have USMC on it, and the adjustment turrets revolve in a different direction, but those are the only differences. If any of you buy one, or become a Marine sniper and shoot one, let me know.

April 13, 2006 | Permalink

Comments
That thing costs more than my first THREE deer rifles combined!

Posted by: Michael | April 13, 2006 at 05:38 PM

I wonder how much this scope would cost if it was originally developed for retail sale instead of the folks that are willing pay $10,000 for a toilet seat. $700, maybe?

Posted by: bobdog | April 18, 2006 at 06:49 AM

I dont know why they are still fretting about the scopes on the m40 when the Barret still does not have its own scope. The old scope for the 40 was working just fine, but you know, the Marines always have to have the elite for their grunts. They need to quit improving and just start developing. Why not make a scope developed just for the Barrets ballistics instead of slapping an old scope from an inadequate M40?

Posted by: Jordan Spitler | April 22, 2006 at 01:28 PM

Bringing a military grade optic to market is quite an expensive process which in these days includes testing for everything from drop resistant to rapid elevation changes. In this case the scope had to survive a rapid atmospheric elevation change equivalent to 40,000 feet. Seems extreme but when you consider the infiltration techniques used by US Special Operations Forces not too unreasonable.

For what its worth, the USMC scope is really a updated and improved version of an existing S&B military scope which unlike the Unertl can be moved around to different platforms since it is not caliber specific. The Unertl while a good scope is far behind technologically (30 years) and the Leupold ULTRA series (now known as the Mark 4) is more than 20 years old. Adopting the S&B instead of having different optics for different guns makes a lot of sense tactically as well as fiscally.

I have examined the scope several times and have spoken at length with both S&B and Premier Reticles who actually assemble the things. On the whole, I am convinced the price paid and the flexibility gained are worth the effort put into getting these things to the Corps.

Posted by: Marc Palmer | March 13, 2007 at 10:43 AM

I have in my possession an old Unert scope - It is marked J.UNERTL USMC
SNIPER-SCOPE and the numbers 1040 - How would I find a fair value price for this scope

Posted by: Frank Raymond | May 01, 2007 at 09:25 AM
 

Trapper L

New member
I voted Burris. The Nikons in the Buckmaster series are okay but there are much better scopes available for the same money. The Monarchs are okay but for the same money, better scopes can be had. The Leopolds are basically a foriegn scope now. The parts including the glass is from China and assembled here. The old Leos are dandys but I'll pass on the new stuff. I've just about wore out the mailman sending mine back and they still aren't right. An old Redfield is just as good as any of the above. The Bushnells are great scopes providing you stay with the 3200 or 4200 series scopes but they aren't a cheap date. The Weaver Grand Slam scopes are now made by Simmons and quailty/reliablity is an issue. So for the best value which includes clarity, low light transmission, warranty, and keeping zero, the Burris is hard to beat. Like any of the others, you can't buy their cheapy and expect to have the best but their top line scopes will constantly be the better value from the day you buy it until your grandson inherites it.
My .02
 
Top