I passed on the Model 28 mentioned in a recent thread. I found a guy that bought a number of Smith and Wesson Model 66-1's from the state. I don't know which agency.
While standing at the counter I picked one that suited me and gave it the Jim March "Revolver Checkout". It was pinned and recessed and had a perfect bore. The side plate screws weren't buggered. The cylinder gap looked good using the eyeball against a bright light test.
My issue with this gun is that I didn't check the gap between the forcing cone and all of the chambers. I checked it on two or three of the chambers but not all six of them. I noticed something later at home.
On three of the chambers the gap seems uniform top to bottom of the forcing cone. The other three, in a row, are a different story. Those three show a gap at the bottom of the cone and NO GAP at the top. To the naked eye it looks as if the top edge of the cone is touching the top edge of the cylinder face for the chamber in battery. But, again, it only does this on three of the six chambers.
What type of issue am a looking at here and what is the fix?
While standing at the counter I picked one that suited me and gave it the Jim March "Revolver Checkout". It was pinned and recessed and had a perfect bore. The side plate screws weren't buggered. The cylinder gap looked good using the eyeball against a bright light test.
My issue with this gun is that I didn't check the gap between the forcing cone and all of the chambers. I checked it on two or three of the chambers but not all six of them. I noticed something later at home.
On three of the chambers the gap seems uniform top to bottom of the forcing cone. The other three, in a row, are a different story. Those three show a gap at the bottom of the cone and NO GAP at the top. To the naked eye it looks as if the top edge of the cone is touching the top edge of the cylinder face for the chamber in battery. But, again, it only does this on three of the six chambers.
What type of issue am a looking at here and what is the fix?