Not only will +P ruin the timing and lockup, but the older j-frame could potentially rupture
In no serviceable weapon will the gun 'rupture' from the use of +P ammo. +P+ is a whole different story (maybe that's what they were referring to) as there's no SAAMI presure specifications for it and it was designed for use in .357 mags only as a way for law enforcement to avoid using 'magnum ammo'.
Practice with standard loads. Fire a cylinder of +p each time you go to the range just to stay in touch with the louder BANG and greater recoil.
Strange then that S&W would recommend against even a few rounds of +P through my old j-frame.
Strange then that S&W would recommend against even a few rounds of +P through my old j-frame.
I'm curious to 45_shooters source for that info, as S&W told me no to +p for my mdl 37 j frame also.
Strange then that S&W would recommend against even a few rounds of +P through my old j-frame.[/QUOTE
It's called Cover Your A$$.
It's called Cover Your A$$.
but for them to go further and emphatically stress not using +P ever in my 1963 manufactured j-frame is what I am getting at.
It will not blow up with factory +P, but shooting a lot of higher pressure ammo will wear out the gun faster.
It's no different than if you drive your car nice and easy versus you constantly floor the accelerator and jamb on the brakes to stop. No one can tell you how much faster your car will wear out but we all know it will be sooner than later.Quote:
It will not blow up with factory +P, but shooting a lot of higher pressure ammo will wear out the gun faster.
That statement, I believe, is the crux of the whole argument.
Now if someone would like to offer up an old j-frame for a test-to-failure experiment with +P loads, I think we would all be very interested in the results.
Now if someone would like to offer up an old j-frame for a test-to-failure experiment with +P loads, I think we would all be very interested in the results.