Hand_Rifle_Guy
New member
So that makes me wonder. Earthquakes, like hurricanes, are an act of God that can lead to a SHTF situation.
We have BUCKETS of literature expounded by the state about quake prepared-ness. Heck, we got stores that specialize in nothing else.
One thing I've noticed about all of these pamphlets is the LACK of the idea that a gun might be a good thing to have around, to fend off looters and such-like. It's like guns don't exist. They tell you stock food, water, batteries, camp fuel, all that good stuff, but the idea that there might be evil people roaming about taking your hard-earned stock of emergency goods AWAY from you is NOT EVEN ADDRESSED.
What, looters don't happen? Got their heads in the sand? Kaliforny liberals just WISH HARD that looters will stay away? That makes a lot of sense.
Two things:
1) what do you think of this hide-your-head-in-the-sand mentality, especially from the likes of agencies specifically engaged to prepare people for the worst, and
2) In other states that face disasters, like Florida, for instance, do the preparedness people maintain the same attitude? Curious, I am, to find out if this attitude is pervasive in bureaucratic institutions designed to help citizens maintain some semblance of civilization when God feels otherwise.
Note: Sending in the National Guard is a good start, but wouldn't it be easier to tell people to watch out for themselves? It seems it would make everyone's job a little easier. When Florida got clobbered by hurricane Andrew, lots of folks took their security into their own hands, because they HAD to.
Maybe I'm asking too much, from institutions that are politically driven. Politicians and government agencies are not allowed to advocate basic rights, it seems. At least in MY stupid state.
Earthquake update: Magnitude 5.1, 3 miles west of Gilroy, Kaliforny, 4.8 miles down. About thirty or so miles south of me. Shook the house, freaked out my mom's dog, (She was an earthquake virgin ) but did no damage, not even cracked plaster. Shaking was rather brisk, lasting 5-6 seconds. Personally, earthquakes are fun, but I've yet to live through a really SERIOUS one. It's coming to this state any minute now, though. These little guys are precursors to a major rumbler. This is one of a pattern of little cracks that precede the monsters, the same as what happened in 1906, when The Great San Francisco Quake scrubbed the City off the map, andf left it looking like Hiroshima after the Bomb. That one, rated at 8.1 or so, shook for TWO MINUTES. That's an ugly thought, and a comparable quake will dump all seven major bridges we have into the S.F. Bay, as ALL of them were built after the Great Quake, but well before anything like understanding of what quakes are capable of. In 1989, the Bay Bridge broke, but did not fully collapse, and that was a mere 7.1 quake located forty miles from the bridge. We're expecting a MAJOR quake in this state, any minute. Destruction looms.
S'okay, though. The liberals earned it for us. The Earth Rejects Them.
Your opinions would be much appreciated. Me? I keep a good stock of ammo around, and enough guns for the whole family, rifles and handguns. But I'm a gun nut, and I know better.
We have BUCKETS of literature expounded by the state about quake prepared-ness. Heck, we got stores that specialize in nothing else.
One thing I've noticed about all of these pamphlets is the LACK of the idea that a gun might be a good thing to have around, to fend off looters and such-like. It's like guns don't exist. They tell you stock food, water, batteries, camp fuel, all that good stuff, but the idea that there might be evil people roaming about taking your hard-earned stock of emergency goods AWAY from you is NOT EVEN ADDRESSED.
What, looters don't happen? Got their heads in the sand? Kaliforny liberals just WISH HARD that looters will stay away? That makes a lot of sense.
Two things:
1) what do you think of this hide-your-head-in-the-sand mentality, especially from the likes of agencies specifically engaged to prepare people for the worst, and
2) In other states that face disasters, like Florida, for instance, do the preparedness people maintain the same attitude? Curious, I am, to find out if this attitude is pervasive in bureaucratic institutions designed to help citizens maintain some semblance of civilization when God feels otherwise.
Note: Sending in the National Guard is a good start, but wouldn't it be easier to tell people to watch out for themselves? It seems it would make everyone's job a little easier. When Florida got clobbered by hurricane Andrew, lots of folks took their security into their own hands, because they HAD to.
Maybe I'm asking too much, from institutions that are politically driven. Politicians and government agencies are not allowed to advocate basic rights, it seems. At least in MY stupid state.
Earthquake update: Magnitude 5.1, 3 miles west of Gilroy, Kaliforny, 4.8 miles down. About thirty or so miles south of me. Shook the house, freaked out my mom's dog, (She was an earthquake virgin ) but did no damage, not even cracked plaster. Shaking was rather brisk, lasting 5-6 seconds. Personally, earthquakes are fun, but I've yet to live through a really SERIOUS one. It's coming to this state any minute now, though. These little guys are precursors to a major rumbler. This is one of a pattern of little cracks that precede the monsters, the same as what happened in 1906, when The Great San Francisco Quake scrubbed the City off the map, andf left it looking like Hiroshima after the Bomb. That one, rated at 8.1 or so, shook for TWO MINUTES. That's an ugly thought, and a comparable quake will dump all seven major bridges we have into the S.F. Bay, as ALL of them were built after the Great Quake, but well before anything like understanding of what quakes are capable of. In 1989, the Bay Bridge broke, but did not fully collapse, and that was a mere 7.1 quake located forty miles from the bridge. We're expecting a MAJOR quake in this state, any minute. Destruction looms.
S'okay, though. The liberals earned it for us. The Earth Rejects Them.
Your opinions would be much appreciated. Me? I keep a good stock of ammo around, and enough guns for the whole family, rifles and handguns. But I'm a gun nut, and I know better.