I ran into a case that was recently decided in the First Circuit Court of Appeals which held police could be held liable for arresting a person for videotaping them during an arrest in a public place. The case is Simon Glik v. John Gunniffe, No. 10-1764, available at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/10-1764P-01A.pdf. Mr. Glik was in the Boston Commons and used his phone to videotape what he thought might be excessive use of force during an arrest.
The issue actually before the court was whether the police were entitled to qualified immunity because the right to videotape them was not a clearly protected right. The Court rejected this argument and said the general public had the same right as the press and the police violated the First Amendment rights of Glik. They also said his Fourth Amendment rights (to be free from unlawful seizure) were not violated as the Massachusetts wiretapping statute protected only against secret audio recording and not recording done openly in public.
The court did indicate it might have seen things a bit differently if Glik had been videotaping them during a traffic stop. Not sure that I can see a big difference since they are still in a public place. I thought it would be of interest given the recent interest in alleged police misconduct caught on videotape.
This opinion only covers those states within the First Circuit.
The issue actually before the court was whether the police were entitled to qualified immunity because the right to videotape them was not a clearly protected right. The Court rejected this argument and said the general public had the same right as the press and the police violated the First Amendment rights of Glik. They also said his Fourth Amendment rights (to be free from unlawful seizure) were not violated as the Massachusetts wiretapping statute protected only against secret audio recording and not recording done openly in public.
The court did indicate it might have seen things a bit differently if Glik had been videotaping them during a traffic stop. Not sure that I can see a big difference since they are still in a public place. I thought it would be of interest given the recent interest in alleged police misconduct caught on videotape.
This opinion only covers those states within the First Circuit.