Vertical Fore Grips

FALPhil

New member
Anyone who tells you they don't need a vertical foregrip on their rifle has never been in a gunfight.

The above quote is attributed to Kyle Lamb of Viking Tactics. I have two questions about it.

1. What tactical activities does a vfg enhance to the point where it becomes a necessity?

2. What in the world did real fighters do concerning those activities prior to the advent of the vfg?

OK, I have three questions.

3. Why would anyone make such an asinine statement?
 

ClydeFrog

Moderator
Background...

I'm no tactical Ted or ACE/ISA/SAD/SAS commando but I did watch a Youtube video of Tactical Response's James Yeager saying he doesn't care for tactical fore-grips or the Magpul style; www.Magpul.com .
I can see valid points for both sides. In general, Id want a fore-grip like a Crimsontrace or SIG Sauer Stop-Light for dynamic CQB events or spec ops.
For general carry or PMC type details, I wouldn't want the fore-grip on my "main ax". ;)

I do think the current US Army issue(white light, bi-pod, grip) is a slick piece of kit.

CF
 

Skadoosh

New member
Vertgrips are very helpful for controlling the muzzle when shooting fully automatic bursts. Other than that, they don't do much for the shooter when shooting semi-automatic.
 

Alabama Shooter

New member
3. Why would anyone make such an asinine statement?

All too easy. Because they are selling VFGs. The way you sell stuff as "tactical" to the masses is to imply all high speed, low drag operators use "whatever" and if you don't then you are clearly inexperienced, uneducated, db mall ninja.

vtac-uvg.jpg

2. What in the world did real fighters do concerning those activities prior to the advent of the vfg?

I canted my wrist about 45 degrees.
 

Tucker 1371

New member
It boils down to personal preference and the application. For 0-100 yds I prefer one, just for comfort. I just qualified expert (2nd award) on the rifle range this weekend and I did not use it as everything on the USMC known distance rifle qual is over 200yds.

My favorite is the AFG from Magpul, I used one in the sandbox. It's awkward at first but once you get used to it it's hard to get used to anything else.

Once again, IMHO the bottom line on VFGs is personal preference.
 

Haz251

New member
It's really all personal preference. I like em. But I really only use them as a reference point for my support hand.
 

FALPhil

New member
B.R., thanks for that link to your previous thread. That was a great write-up and confirms what my intuition was telling me. I have never been comfortable with a vertical fore grip, and while I rarely shoot for speed, I find the AFG much more ergonomic and useful for shooting off hand. However, in truth, I don't shoot measureably better with the AFG than without any grip at all. But, I do shoot much better with no grip and a hasty sling.
 
It also has to do with what you want to accomplish. If I am shooting from a static position for accuracy then I still like to use a more traditional stance that relies on skeletal support. The forward grips work for me in more 3-gun/IDPA type shooting (close and fast). I think one reason people don't appreciate them more is if you are shooting from a firing line at a non-mobile target 100yds or more away, they aren't really that useful.... Especially if it is a range where there is a restriction on the firing rate.
 

Striker1

New member
I don't use one unless I have to...meaning the real estate on the rail or hand guard is too crowded for my hand. They add weight and more importantly bulk so I would weigh the gains carefully.
 

dstyle47

New member
I was told by someone who's opinion I really respected in such matters, that while they were fine if you used them properly, most people should not use them because they encourage you to "pull in" with your support hand, which I was told was a big no no.
 

Striker1

New member
I was told by someone who's opinion I really respected in such matters, that while they were fine if you used them properly, most people should not use them because they encourage you to "pull in" with your support hand, which I was told was a big no no.

I would say it depends on what type shooting you are doing. There are times when it is better to pull back with the support hand.
 

Yung.gunr

New member
The only vertical ones I would use would be the ones that had the light holder or bipod built in. I'm not a fan of the angle it puts your wrist. I do however have a Magpul AFG on my only EBR and I like it. Much more comfortable/natural for me. I have carpal tunnel in both wrists so angles are important to me.
 

Stevie-Ray

New member
I like them. I had a Tango Down on my Colt, but it never really excited me. Then I found a UTG. (Yes, UTG) It fills my hand better and gives me better purchase. Just feels much better all-around.
 

vaeevictiss

New member
I am one that never have liked the vfg. One particular thing I've seen I don't like while watching people use them, is it changes the profile and body position.

Just using your off hand on the rail, you are able to tuck in tighter (again, just my observation of what I've seen). With the vfg, people seem to have the chicken wing going on and their arm sticks way out.

I have recently taken a strong liking to (as corny as it sounds) the stance Chris Costa uses in his carbine demonstrations. He pulls the rifle in tight, and extends his other arm down the length of the forearm, grabbing the end of the forearm with a canted wrist.

I tried it out recently and it was unbelievable how steady and controllable it was engaging different size targets at different ranges very quickly.
 

SVTCobra306

New member
I've shot a lot with and without, with M-4's and M-16A2's. For longer range (300 meter qualification) and accuracy (25m zero) I always took my forward hand grip off. I never used one at all without a rail mount. The biggest advantage of them is keeping yourself from frying your hand. We had Knight's Armament rails on our M-4's in the 82nd Airborne Division, and leading up to deployment we did a lot of CQB live fire training, firing enough rounds in ready-up and similar drills that you could blister your trigger finger if you didn't wear good gloves. In that kind of firing, the rails would get hot enough to burn your hand through the glove, hence everyone used a forward hand grip. Overseas, we used a 150 meter zero rather than a 300, and everyone left their forward hand grip on their rifle.. Some of us had a "normal" one, a few had a bipod version (it makes for a wobbly bipod though), I used a version with a built-in Surefire light, which was very handy since I didn't have to have an extra piece hanging on the rail, and I didn't have to worry about snagging a taped-on pressure switch and wire, plus it weighed a little less than a separate Surefire and hand grip. When you carry your rifle on patrol nearly every day for 18 months, the littlest things like that are a luxury..
 

Pops1085

New member
I have one on both my carbine and my a4 clone and I run them as far to the rear because that is about as close to my natural fighting stance as I can get and it's exactly how my cousins I'm the marines run theirs. I think there is huge difference between competition, "tactical" classes, and actual real world combat. Look at what soldiers and cops do with their rifles compared to civilians who use them in classes or staged competitions.
 
Top