http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsme..._bible_inscriptions_on_military_r.php?ref=fpb
I know this is a touchy subject for some.
In America the bottom line is the bottom line and pretty much everything else is secondary.
If you want to effect how a gun maker produces their product the best way to do so is through their pocket book. If you can get a companies largest client to demand changes in products, you're well on the way to changing the products that company offers to the general public.
For many firearms companies the largest clients are various government agencies. While we generally think that only corporate lobbyists can effect what the government purchases; there is no reason that the same activist infrastructure used to fight gun control can't also be used to effect what the government buys.
For example, many people don't like the locks on S&W revolvers. If a moderate sized government agency were to order revolvers from S&W with the stipulation that there would be no locks on them; the odds would be good that the same option would soon be avilable to the public.
The recent Supreme Court ruling pretty much lets organizations give truck loads of money to politicians.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...lary-movie-filmmakers-campaign-money-dispute/
Who's to say some of that money can't be used to get the Metropolis police force to buy a few thousand no-lock S&W Model 686
Trijicon, the company that produces the military rifle scopes with Biblical inscriptions, will end the decades-old practice and provide the military with modification kits to remove the markings, ABC is reporting.
I know this is a touchy subject for some.
In America the bottom line is the bottom line and pretty much everything else is secondary.
If you want to effect how a gun maker produces their product the best way to do so is through their pocket book. If you can get a companies largest client to demand changes in products, you're well on the way to changing the products that company offers to the general public.
For many firearms companies the largest clients are various government agencies. While we generally think that only corporate lobbyists can effect what the government purchases; there is no reason that the same activist infrastructure used to fight gun control can't also be used to effect what the government buys.
For example, many people don't like the locks on S&W revolvers. If a moderate sized government agency were to order revolvers from S&W with the stipulation that there would be no locks on them; the odds would be good that the same option would soon be avilable to the public.
The recent Supreme Court ruling pretty much lets organizations give truck loads of money to politicians.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...lary-movie-filmmakers-campaign-money-dispute/
Who's to say some of that money can't be used to get the Metropolis police force to buy a few thousand no-lock S&W Model 686