I seen several posters claim that triggers will get better with use or "break in".
I have heard this off and on for years and have never found it to be true.
Is it possible that after several thousand rounds a weaker spring may give the illusion that the trigger is getting better?
I just have to ask because I have put several thousands of rounds through many different guns and I have never had a trigger "improve".
What do you guys think?
If this is the case why do some really old shot to death guns have such poor triggers?
Is trigger "break in" just made up to convince the owner to not spend more money on a trigger job?
Could it be that the trigger parts were so rough to start with that after a burr was worn down the stock trigger "feels" way better than before?
I have heard this off and on for years and have never found it to be true.
Is it possible that after several thousand rounds a weaker spring may give the illusion that the trigger is getting better?
I just have to ask because I have put several thousands of rounds through many different guns and I have never had a trigger "improve".
What do you guys think?
If this is the case why do some really old shot to death guns have such poor triggers?
Is trigger "break in" just made up to convince the owner to not spend more money on a trigger job?
Could it be that the trigger parts were so rough to start with that after a burr was worn down the stock trigger "feels" way better than before?