There have been numerous comments and threads, mostly negative, about the internal locking mechanism on new S&W revolvers. There have also been a few incidental comments, also mostly negative, about the frame-mounted firing pin on these same new revolvers.
What do people think of them?
Honestly, I get the impression that those that don't like them enough to say so don't like them just because they are new and different. But Rugers have always had them, as far as I know, and even Elmer Keith suggested Colt do that with their Single Action Army, though I don't recall he ever suggested S&W do that.
My new S&W revolver has the frame-mounted firing pin and I can't tell any difference. This is the same revolver I have mentioned in other posts in that it has a tapered barrel and the hammer is slotted for the internal lock but there is none. Sort of a parts gun but they all are, in a way.
What do people think of them?
Honestly, I get the impression that those that don't like them enough to say so don't like them just because they are new and different. But Rugers have always had them, as far as I know, and even Elmer Keith suggested Colt do that with their Single Action Army, though I don't recall he ever suggested S&W do that.
My new S&W revolver has the frame-mounted firing pin and I can't tell any difference. This is the same revolver I have mentioned in other posts in that it has a tapered barrel and the hammer is slotted for the internal lock but there is none. Sort of a parts gun but they all are, in a way.