When I built my SBRs, the Sig brace was the only brace on the market, at $179 plus tax... my tax stamp only cost a few dollars more and no worries about changing rulings... or other silly restrictions like vertical fore-grips.I can easily shoot 1.5 to 2 MOA consistently with the Sig brace (and 3x dot or scope) without any kind of shoulder weld--you just need to practice (big surprise). The one huge disadvantage which I seriously question is that it is ridiculously over-priced for a hunk of rubber.
Now that they have ruled that they can be shouldered, I dont understand why the SBR thing doesnt go away, and why you cant use a stock. Makes no sense. Not that a lot of what the ATF comes up with makes any anyway.
I understand that. But they are obviously making determinations as to what a SBR is or isnt, with their brace rulings.The ATF didn't come up with the NFA rules regarding short-barreled rifles.
I dont think they are too worried or impressed.And the only way to fix this is to make our elected officials (both Democrat and Republicans) know that they will lose our votes if they do not work to eliminate this unconstitutional law.
I agree. I put off getting one for a long time. Now I couldnt imagine being without at least a couple.I want to add that the AR pistol is a little guy that you approach with a lot of doubt. Once you start shooting it, your opinion of it changes pretty quickly.