shot LCP & keltec p32

[postal1911]

took both out and shot several 100 rounds thru each w/o any problems.
Lcp was more accurate and i was able to hit much farther than the LCP is made for. all different kinds of 380. my other LCP was even better than this one. kel tec P32 had no malfunctions either, i find there sights even worse, so my super long shots couldnt be done with the p32...couldnt get the long range consistency.....its ok because neither were made to do anything beyond 50 feet.

 

[Keltyke]

.its ok because neither were made to do anything beyond 50 feet.

That's true, "postal". Both of these guns are of the draw, point, shoot type. I don't really know why they bother to put sights on them.

Most of the "mouseguns" are susceptible to failures caused by cheap ammo, being dirty, or limp wristing.

My wife's first generation P-32 has been reliable, except for the above-mentioned problems, for a couple thousand rounds.

 

[Gatorhugger]

They really don't need sights at all. It's more cosmetic for people that demand some sort of bump up there.
I would file mine off, it's just something to snag.
It's a point shooting machine.

 

[BIGR]

I know several guys that carry the Kel Tec. They like them for what they are, a small carry gun thats lite weight.