I'm not quite as negative as some folks about this topic. I've been fairly involved in local politics for a while. A few points:
Shooting ranges are normally governed
only by regulations on a local level, generally the zoning and noise ordinances.
Turnout for local elections is usually
very poor. A few hundred motivated and well organized citizens can easily throw most local elections, unlike a statewide or national election. Local elected officials usually realize this! Make your voice heard!
A few suggestions:
*A specific exception in the noise ordinance allowing shooting ranges, or at least rules that are written to be range-friendly.
*Amend the zoning code so that a shooting range is a legal conforming use, even if a special permit and conditions are required to operate one. This means that the zoning ordinance specifically calls out a shooting range as an allowable land use and defines it.
*Don't accept status as a legal
non-conforming use. This means that a land use is grudgingly allowed
only because it existed before the current zoning was enacted. While this classification could allow a range to continue operating, it will often make building permits impossible to attain, causing the facility to slowly die from neglect.
*Get involved in making sure that surrounding land is zoned for compatible uses.
*Use some sense in designing and locating new ranges. A hint: locate it so that a FEMA floodplain is the only thing downrange for miles. Local regulations, particularly in populated areas, make it very difficult to impossible to build in a floodplain. A range next to a FEMA floodplain will likely never have a housing subdivision on the other side of the backstop.