warbirdlover
New member
I'm extremely disappointed in the scope rings I've bought lately for my Ruger Mk II. I needed high rings for my Meuller 4-16 X 50AO scope and the first pair were Millett's. What I didn't like is the adjusting screws on both sides that make it a bear to get centered and lined up. Then when I tighted the front one up it tilted slightly forward and I didn't catch it. Put a little dent in my scope but the scope is okay. I threw them in the garbage.
I just got a pair of Redfield Ruger Rings and they have the same dang setup! But they seem to be easier to line up.
I know..... I should have just bought a pair of Ruger high rings but check out the price on them and you'll see why I didn't.
I'm not sure how the Leupold rings for the Ruger are but at this point I'm going to hope the Redfield work.
Someone in here commented on how bad the Ruger ring mount setup was and I didn't know why. Now I know why. They have a radiused "slot" in the middle of the top of the action for a radiused thing on the rings. If you don't get the two side screws right it wants to lift the ring up. The Ruger rings only have one screw so to do it right you almost have to buy their rings.
Rant over.....
I just got a pair of Redfield Ruger Rings and they have the same dang setup! But they seem to be easier to line up.
I know..... I should have just bought a pair of Ruger high rings but check out the price on them and you'll see why I didn't.
I'm not sure how the Leupold rings for the Ruger are but at this point I'm going to hope the Redfield work.
Someone in here commented on how bad the Ruger ring mount setup was and I didn't know why. Now I know why. They have a radiused "slot" in the middle of the top of the action for a radiused thing on the rings. If you don't get the two side screws right it wants to lift the ring up. The Ruger rings only have one screw so to do it right you almost have to buy their rings.
Rant over.....