Sako

mooreshawnm

New member
So last night a buddy from work stopped buy with his Sako .375. (Light gun, big bullet...I bet that'll wake you up in the morning!) Any way it was the first time I have handled a Sako and I was really impressed. Are these the excellent rifles they appear to be? I know/think they own Tika but I think Tika's rifles are ugly. This was a thing of beauty. Do they make 'em for left handers? In 6.5 Swede possibly? Let me know because I may have found my new love.
 

Scorch

New member
Sako rifles are a thing of beauty. Not nearly as nice as they used to be, but still very nice. They cost a bit more than your average Remington, but are worth it if you like nice wood. I have not handled any of the newer Sakos, but they are not a light rifle, typically.
 

RT

New member
My wife bought me a Sako 75 for Christmas last year. Talk about a suprise. She really did her homework. A thing of beauty-- the rifle and the wife.
 

Distortion

New member
SAKO of Finland is a well known arms company that produces quality bolt-action hunting rifles.

They are currently owned by the Beretta Holding Corporation which also owns Beretta (obviously), Beretta USA, Benelli, Franchi, Stoeger, Tikka, Uberti, Burris Optics, and 20% of Browning Arms.
 

sserdlihc

New member
I have a model 75 hunter ss/walnut. I have shot plenty of rifles but this one had the smoothest out of the box action I have ever had the pleasure of handling. Before I got the Sako I had (and still have) a Ruger M77 ss/composite. There is no comparison. I still shoot my ruger but I love my Sako.
 

5RWill

New member
I have model 85 hunter .260rem and the wood is beautiful. Scorch is right they are not light. Mine's somewhere around 7-9lbs with scope. It's a camera phone if i had a good camera it would look 10 times better.
21axqvr.jpg

ri6s7d.jpg

2j43ip0.jpg

33yrs5i.jpg
 
Last edited:

mooreshawnm

New member
When I say light I use it in relation to the massive round the thing shoots. It was lighter or should I say felt lighter than the garand and 1903 we had out to compare it to.
 

elkman06

New member
It probably was considerably lighter than either of the two you mentioned.
Light= ease of carry = sore shoulder. Simple physics. Not enough mass to absorb the recoil. I have a Tikka T3 lite chambered in 300wm weighing in at 7lbs w/ the scope. Brutal on the range but didn't feel it on the elk I killed w/ it the last two years. Most of the popular hunting rifles are trending toward light.
Sako is a very nice, very well made rifle.
elkman06
 
Top