Ruger LCR Range and Ammo Test Report

147 Grain

New member
Fired the new $369.00 Ruger LCR in 38 Special for the first time today at my local indoor range. It has one sweet trigger that is superior to the S&W 637-CT with Laser Grips (single & double action) and shoots dead-on at 21' with Buffalo Bore's (BB) Standard Pressure 158-gr. FBI load.

Recoil, OTOH, was noticeably more on the LCR with the factory supplied Hogue-Tamer finger grooved grips because it weighs 15% less than the S&W. http://www.ruger.com/products/lcr/models.html

The Model #5401 LCR is a polymer framed unit and only weighs 13.5-oz. with a 1.875" barrel that retails for $525. The S&W 637-CT (aluminum stainless steel Airweight) weighs 16-oz. with Crimson Trace Laser Grips and 1.875" barrel (retails for $901), but recoil definitely felt about 15% +/- less (???).

http://www.smith-wesson.com/wcsstore/SmWesson2/upload/images/firearms/zoom_lg/163052_01_lg.jpg

I tried 3 different types of ammo in the LCR and each brand appeared to recoil the same, with the Buffalo Bore load yielding the tightest groups offhand at 1 1/2" by 2". The LCR was then put in a shooting vice and yielded the following results (after perfectly aligning the open sights and locking things down):

1. Federal Classic 38 Special +P 158-gr. LSWCHP (Item #C38G) grouped 4" low and 3" to the left at 21'.
2. Speer Short Barrel 38 Special +P 135-gr. Gold Dot (Item #23921) grouped 2" low and 2" to the left at 21'.
3. Buffalo Bore Short Barrel Standard Pressure 158-gr. LWC-HP (Item #20C) grouped dead-on left-to-right and 1/4" high (probably due to a warm barrel) at 21'.

For self defense, the wife uses the S&W 637-CT (with small exposed hammer & laser) with Speer Gold Dot 135-gr. or Federal 158-gr. +P FBI load. I have used this setup with a laser to shoot 1 1/8" ragged groups 1/2 dozen times while braising myself. Federal's 158-gr. load shoots within 1/4" of Speer's short barrel load with the laser.

The LCR will be a BUG and naturally stoked with Buffalo Bore's Standard Pressure Short Barrel 158-gr. since this load shoots to Point of Aim (POA) with the factory sights.

Out of the 3 types of ammo, I have concluded that they're all suitable for self defense and I would not hesitate to go into the ammo supply in storage for either load in either revolver.

Note: Shooting 148-gr. wadcutters in both snubnose revolvers is much funner / manageable for extended shooting time. If you bring your spouse to the range, let her shoot a larger 38 Special with the ***** cat recoil. Wadcutters offer the lowest recoil, then FMJ, and etc., so there's no harm in letting them shoot lighter recoiling loads in a snubnose.

When your life is on the line, recoil won't be felt and it won't matter.
 
Last edited:

TinyDee

New member
Thanks for the report. I am a long time Smith guy but have to say I love the LCR. It is one fine revolver.
 

Vermonter

New member
LCR

I shoot a charter 38 uc light southpaw. It Is excellent for me in 38. I have been considering a n LCR for the lady friend. Curious to see how the wife likes the Lcr?
Thanks, Vermonter.
 

147 Grain

New member
The 357 LCR weighs about 3.5-oz's more than the regular 38 Special version and has larger grips for taming recoil.

Those considering a purchase of a new LCR should consider handling both 357 and 38 models before buying. Some people buy the 357 LCR and shoot 38's in it because recoil is about 20% less than the model described above with the added weight and larger grip.

For serious protection in the woods, suggest you consider Buffalo Bore's short barrel 150-gr. Harcast Wadcutter in 38 Special that's Standard Pressure or their 158-gr. SWC-HP at standard pressure. They also load these two bullets in 357.

For all-around self defense, it's hard to beat Buffalo Bore's (Item #20C) Short Barrel 158-gr. SWC-HP at standard pressure.
 
Last edited:

Vermonter

New member
LCR 357

I was actually thinking along those lines. It would be nice to have a little bigger caliber for small black bears that live in our neck of the woods. She is big (not in the waste-line just tall and strong) so I am not as concerned with recoil. Also she could conceal the larger frame in a purse where I do not have that luxury.
I was wandering more in regards to function. The exact reason I want to get her a revolver is that the semi auto is a little too much work for her to get into service.
Thanks, Vermonter.
 
Top