Ron Paul tells it like it is. A MUST READ!

Dennis Olson

New member
I pirated this tidbit off another board. They didn't have a link though. (perhaps one of you can find it?)

-----------------------------

Texas Congressman Goes on Offensive Against Bloated, War-Mongering Federal Government

Tough talking Texas Rep. Ron Paul blasts big business, the media and his fellow congressman for not putting American first.

By Rep. Ron Paul

The other day, I made a huge "gaffe" on national television. I told the truth about the crimes of the U.S. Government. As you can imagine, the ceiling fell in, and a couple of walls too.

Congressman are supposed to support the government, I was told. Oh, it's okay to criticize around the edges, but there are certain subjects a member of the House of Representatives is not supposed to bring up. I was interviewed on C-SPAN's morning Washington Journal, and I used the opportunity, as I do all such media appearances, to point out how many of our liberties have been stolen by the federal government. If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have no federal meddling in our schools, no Federal Reserve, no U.S. membership in the U.N., no gun control and no foreign aid.

We should have no welfare for corporations or the "poor," no American troops in 100 foreign countries, no NAFTA, GATT or "fast-track," no arrogant federal judges usurping states' rights, no attacks on private property and no income tax. We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal and limited.

That system is called liberty. It's what the Founding Fathers gave us. Under liberty, we built the greates, freest, most prosperous, most decent country on earth. It's no coincidence that the monstrous growth of the federal government has been accompanied by a sickening decline in living standards and moral standards. The feds want us to be hamsters on a treadmill-working hard, all day long, to pay hight taxes, but otherwise entirely docile and controlled.

Well, I'm sorry, but that's not America. It's not what the founders gave us.

So, on that TV interview, I emphasized not only the attacks on our property, but also the decline of our civil liberties, at the hands of the federal police. There are not supposed to be any federal police, according to the Constitution.

Then I really went over the line. I talked about the Waco massacre. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno claim those 81 children, burned down their own church and killed themselves, and good riddance. So they put a few survivors on trial and threw them in prison for 40 years.

"Newspapers foamed at the mouth, calling me a "right-wing extremist". (Say, isn't that what George III called Thomas Jefferson?) We're not supposed to remember that the Bureau of alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms-talk about an unconstitutional Agency-rather than arrest David Koresh on his regular morning jog, called in the TV stations for a big publicity bonanza and sent a SWAT team in black masks and black uniforms to break down his front door, guns blazing. They also sent in a helicopter gunship to shoot at the roof of a church full of innocents.

The Branch Davidians resisted, and after a heartless siege of almost two months, and after cutting off food, water and electricity, and playing horrible rock and roll through huge speakers 24 hours a day, the feds sent in the tanks to crush the walls of the church, and inject poisonous CS gas.

Now, CS gas is banned under the Paris Convention on Chemical Warfare. The U.S. could not use it in a war. But it could and did use it against American civilians. After the tanks did their work on the church, the place burst into flames and all 81 people-men,women, children and babies-were incinerated in a screaming horror. Did some feds set the fire? Did flammable CS gas ignite, since without electricity, the parishioners were using lanterns? striking one of the bales of hay being used against the thin walls as a "defense" against bullets? Or did the Davidians, as Clinton and Reno claim, kill themselves?

Whatever the truth, there's no question that an irresponsible federal government has innocent blood on its hands. In my interview, in answer to a caller's question, I pointed out that Waco, and the federal murders at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, especially the FBI sniper's shot that blasted apart the head of a mother holding her baby, caused many Americans to live in fear of federal power.

Then I uttered the sentiments that caused the median hysteria. I said that a lot of Americans fear that they too might be attacked by federal SWAT teams for exercising their consitutional rights or merely for wanting to be left alone.

You've never seen anything like it. For days, in an all-out assault, I was attacked by Democrats, big business, establishment. Republicans and of course, the media in Washingon and my home state of Texas. Newspapers foamed at the mouth, calling me a "right-wing extremist".

I was even blamed for the Oklahoma City bombing. And by the way, I don't believe we've gotten the full truth on that either. All my opponents were outraged that a congressman would criticize big government. "If you don't like Washington, resign," said a typical big city newspaper editorial.

But the media, as usual, were all wet. Do they ever get anything right? The average congressman may go to Washington to wallow in power and line his pockets with a big lobbying job for special interest-so he can keep ripping off the taxpayers. But that's not why I'm in Congress. It's not why I left my medical practice as a physician. It's not why I refuse a plush congressional pension.

I'm in this fight for a reason. I will not let the crooks and clowns and criminals have their way. I'm in Congress to represent the ideas of liberty, the ideas that you and I share, for the people of my district, for the people of Texas, for the people of America. That's why I'm working to stop federal abuses and to cut the government: its taxes, its bureaucrats, its paramilitary police, its spending, its meddling overseas and every single unconstitutional action it takes.

Not much of the federal leviathan would be left, if I had my way. But you'd be able to keep the money you earn, your privacy would be secure, your dollar would be sound, your local school would be tops and your kids wouldn't be sent off to some useless or vicious foreign war to fight for the U.N. When I say cut taxes, I don't mean fiddle with the code. I mean abolish the income tax and the IRS and replace them with nothing.

Recently, I asked a famous Republican committee chairman, who's always talking about getting rid of the IRS, why he engineered a secret $580 million raise for the tax collectors. "They need it for their computers," this guy told me. So the IRS can't extract enough from us as it is.
I won't play the Capitol Hill games with the Capitol Hill gang, denouncing the IRS while giving the Gestapo more of your money. Or figuring out some other federal tax for them to sqeeze ou of you.

I also want to abolish the Federal Reserve and send Alan Greenspan out to get a job.
The value of our dollar and the level of our interest rates are not supposed to be manipulated by a few members of the power elite meeting secretly in a marble palace. The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional, pure and simple. Without the Federal Reserve, our money could not be inflated a the behest of big govenment or big banks. Your income and savings would not lose their value.

Just as important, we wouldn't have this endless string of booms and busts, recessions and depressions, with each bust getting worse. I also work to save our schools from D.C. interference. Thanks to the feds new curriculums not only smear the Founders as "racist, slave-owning elitists," they seek to dumb down our students so they will all be equal. "Look-say" reading and the abolition of phonics has the same purpose, and so does the new "fuzzy" math, in which there are no right and wrong answers.

But ever since the beginning of federal aid to education and accelerating with the establishment of the rotten Department of Education, SAT scores have been dropping. Schools, with very few exceptions, are getting worse every year. To save our kids, we must get the sticky fingers of the feds off our local schools, and let parents rule.

And then ther's my least favorite topic, the UN. World government is obviously unconstitutional. It undermines our country's sovereignty in the worst way possible. That's why I want us out of the U.N, and the U.N itself taking a hike. After all, the UN is socialist, and corrupt. Many votes can be bought with a "blonde and a case of scotch," one UN ambassador once said. It costs many billions' and it puts our soldiers in UN uniforms under foreign commanders, and sends them off to unconstitutional, undeclared wars.

When Michael New, one of the finest young men I've ever met, objected to wearing UN blue, he was kicked out of the Army. Not one dime for the UN, and not one American soldier. Not in Haiti, not in Bosnia, not in Somalia, not in Rwanda. I know it's radical, but how about devoting our efforts to defending America, and only America?

Rep. Ron Paul is a Republican, congressman from the 14th district in Texas


------------------
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." - H.L. Mencken


[This message has been edited by Dennis Olson (edited September 25, 2000).]
 
J

Jeff, CA

Guest
I voted for the man when he ran for prez. on the libertarian ticket in 1988, and it's tempting to pull up stakes and move to Texas just so I can vote for him again.
 

pax

New member
Woo hoo!! Vote for that boy!

pax

"[The United States] can't be so fixed on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans." -- Bill Clinton in Piscataway, NJ; March 1, 1993
 

Libertarian2k

New member
Of course, YOU didn't vote for Ron Paul when he was the Libertarian Party presidential nominee in 1988, nor will you vote for Harry Browne, who if you check out his website, stands for everything that Ron Paul does.

Nor will you vote for Libertarians who in my opinion, is the only party that is a party of principles.

[This message has been edited by Libertarian2k (edited September 25, 2000).]
 

RH

New member
Libertarian,

Like another libertarian that I've sparred with here, you're not seeing the forest for the trees. You're not seeing the results for your high-minded ideals. What you suggest, while laudable, is silly - even Ron Paul knows that. Do you think he runs as a Republican because he agrees with the whole platform, or because he knows that it is the only way on God's green earth that he would get elected ?!?

Tell me how righteous all you Browne voters will feel when Harry fades into oblivion and we all reap the results of your ineffectual idealism for the next 4...8...? years.

You want to advance the 3rd parties - do it on a grass roots local level, until they can mature to field a viable national party & candidate. Don't think that the 'statement' of Browne's 1% support will resonate with the 2 big parties - it will ring hollow indeed if it is Gore's margin of victory.

This election will be thisclose.

Think.
 

CMOS

New member
DOn't just cheer him on guys - send him money! He is being opposed in the election by a liberal democrat that has LOTS of funding and believe me, there area an awful lot of politicians in DC that want him out.

I've met the man before. He's a true American patriot.

Send money now! http://www.house.gov/paul/

CMOS

------------------
NRA? Good. Now join the GOA!

The NRA is our shield, the GOA will be our sword.

[This message has been edited by CMOS (edited September 25, 2000).]
 

proximo

Moderator
Dennis, Ron Paul has a web site at http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/welcome.htm that is just full of words of wisdom.

I couldn't find an official copy of the document you post here but a search of google.com found this link:
http://www.cmlc.org/cmlc/paul2.htm

with comments that describe it as a fund raising letter sent locally to his constituents. Other links on google described it as being sent around 9/15/1999.

[This message has been edited by proximo (edited September 25, 2000).]
 

kjm

New member
I admire that man more than any other living today (excepting my father). He sounds like a peddling politician until you realize that he REALLY MEANS IT. His votes show it too. 16 times to date, he has been the lone dissenting vote on the floor of the house. SIXTEEN TIMES! I'm proud to call him a TEXAN, and wish my own representative were even close to Ron Paul. I actively campaign for him and have met him on a couple occasions. He doesn't BS you. I watched him explain to a room full of old ladies how Social Security robs their grandchildren of the fruits of their labor. Most politicians would NEVER do this. What Ron Paul says is what Ron Paul does.
My Rep. although Republican has done absolutely nothing in office. He's been so worthless, that I will vote for the Democrat running against him if I cannot find a Libertarian challenger.
Ron Paul does indeed need the money. If you can spare five bucks, it'll help. If we lose him, we lose the last real defender of the ENTIRE Bill Of Rights.
 

Gopher a 45

New member
I just moved into Ron Paul's district, in time for the election, I might add. I'm pretty excited, since for the first time in a long time, I get to vote for someone instead of against the greater of two evils. I need to send the man some cash also.
 

ruger45

Moderator
Im not not worrying about being able to vote for him or any of our other firebrands
like Rep.Helen Chennoeth-Hage whom some would know for her famous
'We need 500 less BATF agents' speech.
Both of these reps. were aided to election by GOA's PVF whom I regularly send money to.
I like my area in TN but my rep and one of my senators are real compromisers so its really nice to know I can get money to those who dont beleive in compromise.
GOA gets money to congressmen who wont compromise and who do have a chance of winning so new gun bills wont even get to
G.W.Bush's desk that hes already said hed sign.

------------------
"those who sacrifice
liberty for security deserve neither"
 

B9mmHP

New member
OK, here is Ron Pauls Phone # 1-800- RON PAUL.

Pick up the phone and call, they take credit cards. Give what you can. $5 $1000 any thing you can

------------------
"Defiance"
And yet...it moves
(Galileo Galilie)

"Spay or Nuter your Socialist Pets"
 

selfdefense4me

New member
I have donated to re-elect Ron Paul in previous elections and in the current race. He is the only politician currently holding office I truly respect.

I have heard in the past (don't know it as a fact, but it is very believable) that Ron Paul receives individual contributions from the widest base of supporters outside his district in the United States -- a record unmatched by anyone else in Congress.

His opponents (anti-types and other liberals) have dubbed Ron Paul "Dr. No" -- a reference to Paul's voting record in Congress. If it isn't constitutional, he votes no. Hence, the derogatory nickname. I see it as a badge of pride.

------------------
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed, and hence clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken
 

Steel

New member
Killer article !!! I already know that Ron Paul is the Real Article - no compromise.
He is right on about the unconstitutionalisty of the income tax. It was never ratified by all the states and the intent of the framers was to generate dollars via the engine of excise/consumption tax. People can and do challenge their taxes and these cases do (see Bill Conklin) get thrown out (i.e. conklin pleads the 5th, etc.)...see his web site.
 

madmike

New member
Consider that the Communist PArty got every single one of its goals in place without EVER electing an official. They took enough votes from democraps to getthem to do it.
Ditto the REligious Right, for good or bad.

If GOre loses by 1/2%, the next liberal candidate will suck up to the Greens.
If Bush loses by 1/2%, I think the current crop of republican POLITICIANS (note the emphasis) are too stupid to take the hint--come on--GW is endorsing trigger locks, assault weapon bans, gun show restrictions, and quibbling on licensing. Then that idiocy that he won't release petroleum reserves to lower gas prices---Gore is promising to, and we know he's lying. WE can hope that the market has solved the problem by then and GW won't have to do a damn thing. But to consistently run as "We are not democrats" is a stupid way to run a campaign, and that's why my current philosophy remains "I'd love to vote for a Republican, but I don't want to throw my vote away."

Because voting for a Republican is merely voting for the democrats of 10 years ago. Creeping Socialism is Socialism nonetheless.

MIke WIlliamson, Indiana State Senate Candidate, District 36. No Compromise on the Bill of Rights.
 

USP45usp

Moderator
I don't know about the rest of ya.. but I've just gotten an idea (and after I write this I need to go and lay down, for some strange reason I have a headache :D)(from thinking too hard.. geez):

1) Make Texas the Nations capital. Why: Better People and they use their brains!

2) Make it an amendment that you can ONLY elect people from Texas to be the President of the U.S.

3) They have to be TRUE Texans to be elected, not transplanted from kali, ny or some other facist nation.

4) Ban Kennedy's(sp), schumers, boxers and feinsteins.... from living in the U.S.

5) Keep the death penality... with at least three people I have in mind going first.

6) ANY and ALL treasonous acts will be dealt with.... TEXAS STYLE!

Any more?

USP45usp

*P.S. to the moderators.. if you think this will distract from the main thread, please feel free to either delete the post or make it it's own. Thanks.
 

HankB

New member
I'm happy that Ron Paul is MY representative!

Yes, I $upport him.

And like someone else said, he's the only candidate for which I can cast a positive ballot, voting FOR him rather than AGAINST his opponent.

(The last time that happened was for Reagan's FIRST term!)
 

kjm

New member
I'd at least allow a transplanted Texan to run for President. Remember: Ron Paul is originally from Pennsylvania. He moved to Texas in the 70's to start his medical practice, and then ran for Congress I believe in '76. He kept at it until in disgust he quit. He then discovered the Libertarian Party, and ran as their Presidential candidate in 1984. Needless to say, he lost, but it was then he realized that the only way things could change is if he was in Congress long enough to get assigned to a good committee. As a strong advocate for currency backed in gold and silver, he found his home on the House Banking and Commerce committee, where he gives Alan Greenspan fits every year when he has his Q & A for the committee. He may not be a native Texan, but we claim him just the same. As a physician (OB/GYN), he is a strong advocate for the banning of abortions. In one of his speeches, he told us that with modern obstetrics (SP?), that the mother's life is NEVER threatened by carrying a pregnancy to term. NEVER. Remember that when Al Gore say's he'll sign partial birth abortion bans as long as it protects a woman's life and health. What he's actually saying is that mental health is health, so if a woman can get depressed by having a baby, it is detrimental to her health. Basically the PBA ban Al Gore wants to sign will not stop one single PBA.
 

johnr

New member
Doc Paul is one of the (few) heroes in my book, amongst that band of thieves in DC.
He's the reason that while I count myself conservative, I like a lot of what I see from the Libertarians.
We need a lot more like him representing us!
 

EricM

New member
RH, It doesn't matter for me. I can vote for mickey mouse, and it wouldn't matter a bit to GWBush as I live in Idaho, the conservative republican stronghold. Due to the electoral college, I will vote for Harry Browne, and useless George won't even notice it. Too bad.
 
Top