Report on Medical costs of guns (Must read)

bookkie

New member
Saw this posted on another board, thought everyone here should read it.

Ncpa Study: Gun Law Suits off
Target, Benefits of Gun Ownership
Exceed the Costs

PRNewswire
23-MAR-99

DALLAS, March 23 /PRNewswire/ -- Despite a number of law suits filed against the gun industry, making similar arguments to the ones used successfully against the tobacco companies, a groundbreaking study by the National Center for Policy Analysis concludes that, unlike tobacco, the benefits of gun ownership exceed the cost.

"Cities have it backwards; guns are used more often by law-abiding citizens to prevent crimes than they are used to commit crimes," says H. Sterling Burnett, a policy analyst with the NCPA and author of the study. "Reduced to a matter of dollars and cents, the savings to cities from defensive gun uses dwarf the cost of gun violence."

According to the study, citizens use guns in self-defense about 2.5 million times each year. Violent crimes are prevented often by merely showing the weapon.

For example:

-- Women faced with assault are 2.5 times less likely to suffer serious injury if they respond with a firearm rather than try to defend themselves with a less effective weapon or offer no resistance.

-- Only one-fifth of victims of violent crimes who defended themselves with firearms suffered injury, compared to almost half who defended themselves using other types of weapons or who had no weapon.

-- About 3,000 criminals are lawfully killed each year by armed civilians
-that's more than three times the number killed by police.

-- As many as 17,000 additional criminals are wounded by civilians each year.

The study for the first time also analyzes the short term and the long term financial benefit to communities from defensive gun use:

-- Using assumptions most favorable to gun opponents, the benefit from defensive gun use ranges from $90.7 million to $3.5 billion, every year.

-- Using more credible assumptions, the net benefit from guns ranges from $1 billion to $38.8 billion per year. Furthermore according to the study, the suits create bad law. One reason the overall rate of serious
crime in the U.S. is at a 20-year low is that since 1987, 22 states have passed concealed carry laws.
"There is no evidence that widespread gun-ownership increases crime,"
Burnett said. "In fact communities that have liberalized their gun laws have seen a marked drop in violent crime."

To receive a copy of the study, contact the NCPA at 972-386-6272 or in Washington, D.C. at 202-628-6671. You can also download a copy of the study or view a delayed broadcast of a press conference releasing the study, online at http://www.ncpa.org.

Richard
 

Coinneach

Staff Alumnus
There's one major problem with the study:

It won't do a frikkin' thing to change the minds of the antis. They've too much invested in their self-image as Saviors Of Humanity to admit that they're wrong.

Logic doesn't make a dent in the antis' arguments.

And on a lighter note, I just found this bit toward the end of the report, where guns are contrasted with tobacco:

Guns... are not addictive.

I dunno about that part :D
------------------
"Quemadmoeum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est."
(The sword does not kill; it is a tool in the hands of the killer.)
--Seneca "the Younger" (ca. 4 BC-65 AD)




[This message has been edited by Coinneach (edited March 26, 1999).]
 

ursus

New member
Check this out, I went to the local sawbones
that I was directed to by my socialist
" health care provider" hmo for another referral (direction) for a check up. Looking over the usual b.s. forms, I found questions like: Do you wear your seat belt while driving?, Do you wear a helmet when bike riding ?, but the real kicker.... Do you have a gun in your home ? If you do, is it secured safely ? I left them all blank. The nurse took me in to do the usual mundane tasks. She looked over the paper work and said that I had missed a few questions. I stated I chose not to answer and that it was not pertinent information for a medical visit. She just gave a typical blank sheeple stare.
 
My latest form in a Dentist's office..."do you use alcohol or *other* dangerous drugs". Now I know that alcohol can be dangerous...but it's hardly crack, smack or meth. I was mildly insulted.

BTW....Indemnity insurance is far closer to a socialist concept than is managed care.
Rich

[This message has been edited by Rich Lucibella (edited March 27, 1999).]
 
Top